Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Boot Drive156% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory26.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210311
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 04 '21 at 04:28
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 82.8
1-Core 160
2-Core 320
100% 188 Pts
4-Core 641
8-Core 1,261
112% 951 Pts
64-Core 2,271
140% 2,271 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 101%
Great: 97%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega-64-$400
Asus(1043 04D0) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1680 MHz, MLim: 1018 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.5.2
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 110
Reflection 116
Parallax 194
90% 140 fps
Gravity 130
Splatting 80
90% 105 fps
Poor: 77% Great: 94%
Nvidia GTX 650-Ti-$152
Nvidia(10DE 1016) 1GB
CLim: 928 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 456.71
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 16.4
Reflection 17.3
Parallax 21.8
13% 18.5 fps
Gravity 21.2
Splatting 16
16% 18.6 fps
Poor: 13% Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kbg30zmv256g TOSHIBA 256GB
139GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ADHA0102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 390 277 210 364 327 288 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
156% Outstanding
Read 952
Write 401
Mixed 483
SusWrite 309
118% 536 MB/s
4K Read 52.2
4K Write 140
4K Mixed 71.7
245% 88 MB/s
DQ Read 654
DQ Write 358
DQ Mixed 429
340% 481 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 156%
Great: 147%
Kingston A400 120GB-$29
44GB free
Firmware: SBFKB1E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 264 143 147 222 177 141 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
55.7% Above average
Read 300
Write 106
Mixed 200
SusWrite 182
44% 197 MB/s
4K Read 29.4
4K Write 44.9
4K Mixed 24.8
100% 33 MB/s
DQ Read 46.6
DQ Write 49
DQ Mixed 44
34% 46.5 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 85%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 1TB-$56
730GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 109 110 113 115 116 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
59.7% Above average
Read 95.7
Write 122
Mixed 55.6
SusWrite 112
70% 96.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1.5
257% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 70%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
150GB free
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 165 168 166 171 172 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
95.9% Outstanding
Read 168
Write 133
Mixed 23.1
SusWrite 167
88% 123 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.3
76% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 95.9%
Great: 103%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$100
2.5TB free
Firmware: MX6OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 185 185 187 189 187 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 183
Write 183
Mixed 38.4
SusWrite 186
106% 147 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.6
159% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 106%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFS8266.C8FE CT8G4DFS8266.M8FE CT8G4DFS8266.C8FE CT8G4DFS8266.M8FE 32GB
3333, 3333, 3333, 3333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
115% Outstanding
MC Read 45.3
MC Write 41.5
MC Mixed 41.3
122% 42.7 GB/s
SC Read 32
SC Write 25.3
SC Mixed 33.4
86% 30.2 GB/s
Latency 75.5
53% 75.5 ns
Poor: 113%
This bench: 115%
Great: 124%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING Builds (Compare 3,856 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING - $190

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $1,013
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback