Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive150% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory25.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210311
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 05 '21 at 15:29
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4.3 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
98% Outstanding
Memory 81.1
1-Core 155
2-Core 311
97% 182 Pts
4-Core 614
8-Core 1,238
109% 926 Pts
64-Core 2,257
140% 2,257 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 98%
Great: 97%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega-64-$400
Asus(1043 04D0) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1640 MHz, MLim: 1010 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.5.2
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 111
Reflection 113
Parallax 187
90% 137 fps
Gravity 126
Splatting 78.6
87% 102 fps
Poor: 77% Great: 94%
Nvidia GTX 650-Ti-$152
Nvidia(10DE 1016) 1GB
CLim: 928 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 456.71
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 16.2
Reflection 17.3
Parallax 21.9
13% 18.5 fps
Gravity 21.1
Splatting 16
16% 18.5 fps
Poor: 13% Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kbg30zmv256g TOSHIBA 256GB
139GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ADHA0102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 329 320 299 293 155 618 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
150% Outstanding
Read 964
Write 424
Mixed 669
SusWrite 336
133% 598 MB/s
4K Read 53.1
4K Write 95
4K Mixed 72.4
224% 73.5 MB/s
DQ Read 654
DQ Write 252
DQ Mixed 387
303% 431 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 150%
Great: 147%
Kingston A400 120GB-$29
44GB free
Firmware: SBFKB1E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 272 146 150 265 149 152 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
56.1% Above average
Read 300
Write 105
Mixed 200
SusWrite 189
44% 198 MB/s
4K Read 29.4
4K Write 44.7
4K Mixed 24.8
100% 33 MB/s
DQ Read 46.4
DQ Write 48.9
DQ Mixed 44.6
34% 46.6 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 85%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 1TB-$56
709GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 112 120 118 120 119 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
39.5% Below average
Read 20.9
Write 14.7
Mixed 34.6
SusWrite 116
34% 46.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.3
89% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 70%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
150GB free
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 175 175 175 175 175 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
94.6% Outstanding
Read 159
Write 83.5
Mixed 23.1
SusWrite 171
79% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.3
70% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 94.6%
Great: 103%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$100
2.5TB free
Firmware: MX6OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 186 186 188 188 188 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 174
Write 180
Mixed 21.2
SusWrite 186
101% 140 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.6
157% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 103%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFS8266.C8FE CT8G4DFS8266.M8FE CT8G4DFS8266.C8FE CT8G4DFS8266.M8FE 32GB
3333, 3333, 3333, 3333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
113% Outstanding
MC Read 44.9
MC Write 41.3
MC Mixed 40.1
120% 42.1 GB/s
SC Read 30.4
SC Write 24.8
SC Mixed 33.2
84% 29.5 GB/s
Latency 78.5
51% 78.5 ns
Poor: 113%
This bench: 113%
Great: 124%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING Builds (Compare 3,854 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING - $190

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $1,013
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback