Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H V2-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics18.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive49.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte A320M-S2H V2
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-S2H V2-CF  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200803
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 29 '21 at 09:23
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$140
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
76.4% Very good
Memory 76.1
1-Core 110
2-Core 224
76% 136 Pts
4-Core 413
8-Core 626
64% 519 Pts
64-Core 815
50% 815 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Nvidia(10DE 1380) 2GB
CLim: 1359 MHz, MLim: 1375 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 466.47
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
18.2% Very poor
Lighting 22.5
Reflection 19.2
Parallax 21.8
18% 21.2 fps
MRender 26
Gravity 24
Splatting 17.6
18% 22.5 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 18.2%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$53
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF430400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 250 97 113 121 98 98 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
49.2% Average
Read 446
Write 353
Mixed 188
SusWrite 130
62% 279 MB/s
4K Read 17.6
4K Write 29.3
4K Mixed 17.1
64% 21.3 MB/s
DQ Read 113
DQ Write 57.8
DQ Mixed 16.6
31% 62.4 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 55%
Seagate ST3250410AS 250GB-$95
73GB free
Firmware: 3.AAC
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 79 80 80 80 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
44.7% Average
Read 76.5
Write 51.5
Mixed 39.8
SusWrite 79.2
45% 61.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99P5723-006.A00G 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
85.1% Excellent
MC Read 33.2
MC Write 31
MC Mixed 27.9
88% 30.7 GB/s
SC Read 21.9
SC Write 31.8
SC Mixed 25.4
75% 26.4 GB/s
Latency 88.1
45% 88.1 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A320M-S2H V2-CF Builds (Compare 1,542 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H V2-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $302
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback