Asus M32CD4-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics51.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive68.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus M32CD4-K  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK M32CD4-K
Memory1.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170411
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateMay 25 '21 at 16:41
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$70
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
79.6% Very good
Memory 89.5
1-Core 102
2-Core 211
77% 134 Pts
4-Core 404
8-Core 400
54% 402 Pts
64-Core 387
24% 387 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Asus(1043 200B) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 466.27
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (64 fps cap detected)
51.3% Above average
Lighting 63.1
Reflection 64.9
Parallax 59.6
51% 62.5 fps
MRender 65.1
Gravity 64.2
Splatting 59.1
51% 62.8 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS128G32TND-N210A 128GB
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 30200P10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 75 105 96 129 106 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
68.1% Good
Read 414
Write 131
Mixed 150
SusWrite 101
44% 199 MB/s
4K Read 30.7
4K Write 82.3
4K Mixed 22.5
119% 45.2 MB/s
DQ Read 329
DQ Write 132
DQ Mixed 124
120% 195 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 75%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
239GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 88 85 84 79 112 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
72.5% Very good
Read 162
Write 143
Mixed 69.8
SusWrite 90.5
85% 116 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
160% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 113%
1 4TB
92GB free
Firmware: 0101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 77 80 83 80 81 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
67.1% Good
Read 155
Write 90.7
Mixed 52
SusWrite 79.6
69% 94.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
82% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 91%
0 4TB
312GB free
Firmware: 0101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 78 80 83 80 81 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
56.9% Above average
Read 118
Write 124
Mixed 92.7
SusWrite 79.6
77% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
172% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 93%
WDC WD40 EFRX-68N32N0 4TB
561GB free, PID 2352
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 21 21 21 21 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
11.6% Very poor
Read 37
Write 31.7
Mixed 23.5
SusWrite 20.8
37% 28.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
37% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.6%
Great: 22%
WDC WD40 EFRX-68N32N0 4TB
704GB free, PID 2352
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 21 21 21 21 21 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
17.8% Very poor
Read 37.5
Write 39
Mixed 30.5
SusWrite 20.8
42% 32 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
125% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 17.8%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851U6AFR6N-UH 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
65.9% Good
MC Read 25.2
MC Write 24.2
MC Mixed 19.9
66% 23.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 23.2
SC Mixed 21.1
57% 19.9 GB/s
Latency 67.9
59% 67.9 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M32CD4-K Builds (Compare 698 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Asus M32CD4-K

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $171
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback