bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive19% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (67%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Motherboard NM70-M
Memory6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131216
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 12 '21 at 10:56
Run Duration219 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 67%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron 1037U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
32.3% Below average
Memory 48.4
1-Core 49.9
2-Core 94.4
38% 64.2 Pts
4-Core 95.9
8-Core 94.4
13% 95.2 Pts
64-Core 94.8
6% 94.8 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 32.3%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI HD 3650
PwrHis(1787 2003) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
2.1% Terrible
Lighting 2.4
Reflection 2.2
Parallax 1.4
2% 2 fps
MRender 2.8
Gravity 1.1
Splatting 4.3
2% 2.73 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.1%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
KingFast 60GB
6GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.094.12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 26 40 43 43 41 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
19% Very poor
Read 256
Write 2
Mixed 63.3
SusWrite 34.3
19% 88.8 MB/s
4K Read 10
4K Write 9.7
4K Mixed 0.1
20% 6.6 MB/s
DQ Read 29.9
DQ Write 27
DQ Mixed 9.3
12% 22.1 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 19%
Great: 59%
Fc-1307 SD to CF Adapter V1.1 67GB
62GB free
Firmware: Rev 1.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.9 1 0.8 0.9 1.2 1.2 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
1.04% Terrible
Read 1.5
Write 0.2
Mixed 0.2
SusWrite 1.2
1% 0.78 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
117% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.04%
Great: 3%
WD WD800JD-75MSA3 80GB-$105
74GB free
Firmware: 05.01C05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 56 56 56 55 56 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
31.8% Below average
Read 54.8
Write 54.4
Mixed 36.9
SusWrite 55.7
37% 50.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
153% 1 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 31.8%
Great: 33%
Generic Flash Disk0912 124GB
76GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.6 7 8.8 8.6 9.4 9.4 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 7.7
Write 1.7
SusWrite 7.8
7% 5.73 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
6% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
26.5% Poor
MC Read 9.5
MC Write 9.7
MC Mixed 7.8
26% 9 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 8.8
26% 9.27 GB/s
Latency 167
24% 167 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 26.5%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,338 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback