bin bin

Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 24% Surfboard	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	1.28% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	23.2% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	NM70-M
Memory	0.8 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20131216
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Apr 29 '21 at 17:15
Run Duration	178 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron 1037U 2,458 User benchmarks, average bench 43% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	50.7% Above average	Memory 85.6 1-Core 49.6 2-Core 93.3 50% 76.2 Pts	4-Core 95.1 8-Core 98.1 13% 96.6 Pts	64-Core 95.3 6% 95.3 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 50.7% Great: 52%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz) 28,701 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Elitegroup(1019 2111) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358 Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	1.28% Terrible	Lighting 1.4 Reflection 0.5 Parallax 1.3 1% 1.07 fps	MRender 2.8 Gravity 1 Splatting 1.9 2% 1.9 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.28% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
KingFast 60GB 169 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 8GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.094.12 SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 11 6.4 8.9 10 24 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	23.2% Poor	Read 380 Write 49 Mixed 65 SusWrite 12.7 27% 127 MB/s	4K Read 5.8 4K Write 20.1 4K Mixed 0.1 20% 8.67 MB/s	DQ Read 39.5 DQ Write 51.7 DQ Mixed 0.7 13% 30.6 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 23.2% Great: 59%
Fc-1307 SD to CF Adapter V1.1 67GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 2% 62GB free Firmware: Rev 1.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.6 1 1 0.9 1.2 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		Read 3 Write 0.2 SusWrite 1.2 1% 1.47 MB/s	4K Read 2.2 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 92% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 1% Great: 3%
WD WD800JD-75MSA3 80GB-$105 18,464 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 74GB free Firmware: 05.01C05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 50 52 54 55 55 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	30.7% Below average	Read 53.7 Write 53.1 Mixed 37 SusWrite 52.9 36% 49.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.9 156% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 30.7% Great: 33%
Generic Flash Disk0912 124GB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 76GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4 18 19 17 17 17 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 6.7 Write 0.2 SusWrite 15.3 10% 7.4 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 5% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 6%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT25664BA160B.C8FE 1x2GB 62 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 1 of 2 slots used 2GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	30.9% Below average	MC Read 10 MC Write 10.6 MC Mixed 9 28% 9.87 GB/s	SC Read 9.6 SC Write 9.4 SC Mixed 9 27% 9.33 GB/s	Latency 71.5 56% 71.5 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 30.9% Great: 32%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,262 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	2,023x
Core i7-2600Intel $192Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	1,568x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	932x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,322x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples	1,141x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1,040x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	821x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples	456x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	425x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	516x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	376x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	297x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16