bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 25%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.27% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive15.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (90%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
Motherboard NM70-M
Memory0.7 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131216
Uptime10.9 Days
Run DateMay 10 '21 at 09:56
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 90%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron 1037U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
52.8% Above average
Memory 91.8
1-Core 34
2-Core 97.1
49% 74.3 Pts
4-Core 88.2
8-Core 67.4
11% 77.8 Pts
64-Core 94.3
6% 94.3 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Elitegroup(1019 2111) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
1.27% Terrible
Lighting 1.4
Reflection 0.5
Parallax 1.4
1% 1.1 fps
MRender 2.7
Gravity 1
Splatting 1.9
2% 1.87 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.27%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
KingFast 60GB
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.094.12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.2 11 12 4.1 10 13 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
15.7% Very poor
Read 239
Write 7
Mixed 76.1
SusWrite 9.4
18% 82.8 MB/s
4K Read 8.8
4K Write 5.6
4K Mixed 2.6
20% 5.67 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 59%
Fc-1307 SD to CF Adapter V1.1 67GB
62GB free
Firmware: Rev 1.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.9 1.2 1.2 0.9 1 1.2 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
1.02% Terrible
Read 1.5
Write 0.2
Mixed 1.5
SusWrite 1.2
1% 1.1 MB/s
4K Read 2.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
108% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.02%
Great: 3%
WD WD800JD-75MSA3 80GB-$105
74GB free
Firmware: 05.01C05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 48 50 54 54 53 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
30.3% Below average
Read 53.5
Write 52.9
Mixed 37.8
SusWrite 51.8
36% 49 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
155% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 30.3%
Great: 33%
Generic Flash Disk0912 124GB
76GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.8 6.9 7.2 7.8 7 5.7 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Write 1.7
Mixed 1.7
SusWrite 6.9
6% 3.43 MB/s
4K Mixed 0
0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT25664BA160B.C8FE 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
30.6% Below average
MC Read 10
MC Write 9.4
MC Mixed 9.4
28% 9.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 8.8
26% 9 GB/s
Latency 64.4
62% 64.4 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,336 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback