Notebook P65_P67SE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (94th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 6 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.19% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 61% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemNotebook P65_P67SE  (all builds)
MotherboardNotebook P65_P67SE
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150722
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 09 '21 at 11:36
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU7%
CPU Throttled 61%

 PC Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4720HQ
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
70.6% Very good
Memory 80.5
1-Core 98.8
2-Core 188
70% 122 Pts
4-Core 328
8-Core 528
52% 428 Pts
64-Core 527
33% 527 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Clevo(1558 6555) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5063
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.19% Terrible
Lighting 1.3
Reflection 1
Parallax 2.4
1% 1.57 fps
MRender 3
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 1.6
1% 1.8 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.19%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$65
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 5,633
Write 4,493
Mixed 4,924
1,117% 5,016 MB/s
4K Read 434
4K Write 200
4K Mixed 252
1,087% 295 MB/s
DQ Read 920
DQ Write 562
DQ Mixed 687
526% 723 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 118%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
5GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,054
Write 942
Mixed 856
212% 950 MB/s
4K Read 54
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 70.3
226% 75.4 MB/s
DQ Read 792
DQ Write 680
DQ Mixed 713
540% 728 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS8G3N18AES4.16FE Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 16GB
1333, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
56% Above average
MC Read 21.2
MC Write 20.6
MC Mixed 16.6
56% 19.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 18.4
SC Mixed 19.7
50% 17.6 GB/s
Latency 79.6
50% 79.6 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 56%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P65_P67SE Builds (Compare 100 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Notebook P65_P67SE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback