Notebook P65_P67SE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.34% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemNotebook P65_P67SE  (all builds)
MotherboardNotebook P65_P67SE
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150722
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 08 '21 at 16:51
Run Duration108 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4720HQ
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
71.4% Very good
Memory 83.5
1-Core 100
2-Core 188
72% 124 Pts
4-Core 320
8-Core 533
52% 427 Pts
64-Core 531
33% 531 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Clevo(1558 6555) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5063
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
3.34% Terrible
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 2.6
Parallax 6.4
3% 4.23 fps
MRender 7.6
Gravity 2.5
Splatting 4.7
4% 4.93 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.34%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$72
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 5,358
Write 4,801
Mixed 4,876
1,118% 5,012 MB/s
4K Read 457
4K Write 208
4K Mixed 261
1,136% 309 MB/s
DQ Read 958
DQ Write 592
DQ Mixed 724
553% 758 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 118%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
5GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,255
Write 1,082
Mixed 1,041
251% 1,126 MB/s
4K Read 62.5
4K Write 129
4K Mixed 76.7
261% 89.5 MB/s
DQ Read 810
DQ Write 714
DQ Mixed 764
572% 763 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS8G3N18AES4.16FE Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 16GB
1333, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
56% Above average
MC Read 20.9
MC Write 20.7
MC Mixed 16.5
55% 19.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 18.5
SC Mixed 18.9
50% 17.5 GB/s
Latency 74.3
54% 74.3 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 56%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P65_P67SE Builds (Compare 100 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Notebook P65_P67SE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback