Asus H97-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics84.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (77%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H97-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160226
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 25 '21 at 12:33
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 77%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1231 v3-$209
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
82% Excellent
Memory 93.3
1-Core 107
2-Core 217
80% 139 Pts
4-Core 382
8-Core 569
59% 475 Pts
64-Core 561
35% 561 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 82%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.66
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
84.7% Excellent
Lighting 106
Reflection 112
Parallax 103
86% 107 fps
MRender 94.4
Gravity 103
Splatting 99.7
81% 99.1 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$129
87GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 414 408 419 384 246 227 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 510
Write 462
Mixed 372
SusWrite 350
95% 424 MB/s
4K Read 35.8
4K Write 99.8
4K Mixed 45.5
165% 60.4 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 331
253% 344 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 108%
Great: 124%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 1TB-$68
313GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 138 138 139 139 139 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
94.6% Outstanding
Read 190
Write 150
Mixed 64.2
SusWrite 139
99% 136 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 2.6
446% 3.07 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 94.6%
Great: 112%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$55
390GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 75 74 75 75 73 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
46.2% Average
Read 87.2
Write 80
Mixed 81.3
SusWrite 73.5
60% 80.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 67%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
51GB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 134 133 185 191 138 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
96.8% Outstanding
Read 185
Write 156
Mixed 86.7
SusWrite 153
106% 145 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 96.8%
Great: 114%
WD Elements 25A3 4TB
2TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 161 162 163 163 165 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
67% Good
Read 156
Write 157
Mixed 114
SusWrite 163
200% 148 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
136% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 67%
Great: 105%
WDC WD10 EACS-00D6B1 1TB
432GB free, PID 0c31
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 36 37 37 37 37 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
19.2% Very poor
Read 34.5
Write 33.7
Mixed 27.7
SusWrite 36.5
45% 33.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
94% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 19.2%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
60.2% Good
MC Read 21.8
MC Write 22
MC Mixed 18.6
59% 20.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 19
SC Mixed 18.6
51% 17.8 GB/s
Latency 61.5
65% 61.5 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H97-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,928 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus H97-PLUS - $132

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $567
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback