Asus H97-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 72%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics85% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive92.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H97-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160226
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 21 '21 at 17:06
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1231 v3-$209
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
82.8% Excellent
Memory 91.3
1-Core 104
2-Core 215
78% 137 Pts
4-Core 403
8-Core 569
61% 486 Pts
64-Core 565
35% 565 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 82.8%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.66
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
85% Excellent
Lighting 107
Reflection 112
Parallax 103
87% 107 fps
MRender 94.5
Gravity 103
Splatting 99.7
81% 99.2 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 85%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$129
91GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 425 426 421 416 383 349 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
92.9% Outstanding
Read 509
Write 481
Mixed 376
SusWrite 403
100% 442 MB/s
4K Read 33.4
4K Write 85.5
4K Mixed 14.6
115% 44.5 MB/s
DQ Read 346
DQ Write 341
DQ Mixed 339
256% 342 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 92.9%
Great: 124%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 1TB-$68
369GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 134 134 134 133 134 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
74.1% Very good
Read 123
Write 112
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 134
78% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 2.5
435% 3.03 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 112%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$55
390GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 74 75 75 75 73 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
49.5% Average
Read 98.5
Write 78
Mixed 53.8
SusWrite 73.8
56% 76 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
147% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 67%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
51GB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 135 135 186 185 139 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
98.6% Outstanding
Read 192
Write 155
Mixed 86.2
SusWrite 152
107% 146 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 98.6%
Great: 114%
WD Elements 25A3 4TB
2TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 164 163 163 163 163 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
66.3% Good
Read 151
Write 157
Mixed 122
SusWrite 163
203% 148 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
137% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 105%
WDC WD10 EACS-00D6B1 1TB
432GB free, PID 0c31
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 36 37 37 37 37 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
19.7% Very poor
Read 35.2
Write 36.5
Mixed 28.7
SusWrite 36.5
47% 34.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
98% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 19.7%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
60.8% Good
MC Read 21.9
MC Write 22.1
MC Mixed 18.7
60% 20.9 GB/s
SC Read 17.3
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 20
54% 19.1 GB/s
Latency 65.4
61% 65.4 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H97-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,935 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus H97-PLUS - $132

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $567
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback