Asus H97-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics85.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (83%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H97-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160226
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 03 '21 at 10:58
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 83%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1231 v3-$209
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
83.9% Excellent
Memory 93.6
1-Core 85
2-Core 155
68% 111 Pts
4-Core 403
8-Core 569
61% 486 Pts
64-Core 567
35% 567 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.66
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
85.4% Excellent
Lighting 107
Reflection 112
Parallax 103
87% 107 fps
MRender 94.7
Gravity 104
Splatting 99.8
82% 99.3 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$129
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 419 412 410 290 170 156 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 473
Mixed 376
SusWrite 309
94% 417 MB/s
4K Read 35.5
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 46.3
167% 61.3 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 345
263% 355 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 107%
Great: 124%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 1TB-$68
280GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 158 157 158 157 158 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
92.8% Outstanding
Read 165
Write 129
Mixed 61
SusWrite 158
93% 128 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 2.6
444% 3.03 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 92.8%
Great: 112%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$55
390GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 74 75 75 75 73 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
48% Average
Read 93.5
Write 77.3
Mixed 74
SusWrite 73.8
59% 79.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
106% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 48%
Great: 67%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
51GB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 133 135 187 189 138 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
98.6% Outstanding
Read 191
Write 154
Mixed 86.9
SusWrite 152
107% 146 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 98.6%
Great: 114%
WD Elements 25A3 4TB
2TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 162 165 163 164 164 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
67.5% Good
Read 158
Write 156
Mixed 117
SusWrite 164
202% 149 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
137% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 105%
WDC WD10 EACS-00D6B1 1TB
432GB free, PID 0c31
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 36 37 37 37 37 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
19.3% Very poor
Read 35.2
Write 36.3
Mixed 27.8
SusWrite 36.5
46% 34 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
94% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 19.3%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
60.8% Good
MC Read 21.8
MC Write 22.1
MC Mixed 18.6
60% 20.8 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 20.2
SC Mixed 19.1
54% 18.8 GB/s
Latency 60.8
66% 60.8 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H97-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,934 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus H97-PLUS - $132

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $567
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback