Asus H97-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics84.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive110% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H97-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160226
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 03 '21 at 18:59
Run Duration195 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 38%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1231 v3-$209
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
78.9% Very good
Memory 91.5
1-Core 106
2-Core 215
79% 138 Pts
4-Core 358
8-Core 560
57% 459 Pts
64-Core 556
34% 556 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 78.9%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.66
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
84.7% Excellent
Lighting 106
Reflection 111
Parallax 102
86% 107 fps
MRender 94.3
Gravity 103
Splatting 99.7
81% 99.1 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$130
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 422 435 432 421 355 156 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 502
Write 480
Mixed 369
SusWrite 370
97% 430 MB/s
4K Read 35.2
4K Write 99.2
4K Mixed 45.4
164% 59.9 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 349
DQ Mixed 347
266% 359 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 110%
Great: 124%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 1TB-$68
280GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 104 104 103 104 104 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
73.1% Very good
Read 150
Write 105
Mixed 62.3
SusWrite 103
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 2.6
446% 3.07 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 112%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$55
390GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 74 75 75 73 73 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
47.4% Average
Read 91.5
Write 87.5
Mixed 81.2
SusWrite 73.3
62% 83.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
129% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 67%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
51GB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 134 136 184 188 140 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
97.5% Outstanding
Read 187
Write 153
Mixed 86
SusWrite 153
106% 145 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 97.5%
Great: 114%
WD Elements 25A3 4TB
2TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 162 165 163 164 165 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
67.2% Good
Read 156
Write 157
Mixed 122
SusWrite 164
204% 150 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
137% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 105%
WDC WD10 EACS-00D6B1 1TB
432GB free, PID 0c31
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 36 37 37 37 37 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
20% Very poor
Read 35.5
Write 34.5
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 36.4
46% 33.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
101% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 20%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
60.1% Good
MC Read 21.6
MC Write 22
MC Mixed 18.6
59% 20.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 19
53% 18.5 GB/s
Latency 64.9
62% 64.9 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H97-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,935 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus H97-PLUS - $132

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $567
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback