Monster TULPAR T7 V20.3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 96%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 87%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive196% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMonster TULPAR T7 V20.3  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER TULPAR T7 V20.3
Memory9.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210219
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateApr 10 '21 at 22:18
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
94.6% Outstanding
Memory 93.6
1-Core 142
2-Core 266
94% 167 Pts
4-Core 514
8-Core 838
83% 676 Pts
64-Core 1,019
63% 1,019 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 94.6%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060 (Laptop)
Device(1D05 1116) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.6589
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Lighting 135
Reflection 128
Parallax 123
110% 128 fps
MRender 134
Gravity 94.6
Splatting 86
84% 105 fps
Poor: 67%
This bench: 101%
Great: 105%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ512HALU-00000 512GB
293GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXV7101Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1253 1007 280 335 334 325 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
196% Outstanding
Read 1,239
Write 1,070
Mixed 1,014
SusWrite 589
219% 978 MB/s
4K Read 49.3
4K Write 133
4K Mixed 68
232% 83.3 MB/s
DQ Read 908
DQ Write 831
DQ Mixed 929
680% 889 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 196%
Great: 206%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFRA32A.M4FE 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
61.2% Good
MC Read 25.1
MC Write 19.4
MC Mixed 16.3
58% 20.3 GB/s
SC Read 18.1
SC Write 25.3
SC Mixed 23.1
63% 22.2 GB/s
Latency 60.8
66% 60.8 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TULPAR T7 V20.3 Builds (Compare 601 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Battle cruiser

System: Monster TULPAR T7 V20.3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback