Monster TULPAR T7 V20.3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics93.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive195% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMonster TULPAR T7 V20.3  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER TULPAR T7 V20.3
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210219
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 10 '21 at 14:38
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
86% Excellent
Memory 81.8
1-Core 130
2-Core 245
84% 152 Pts
4-Core 485
8-Core 706
74% 595 Pts
64-Core 829
51% 829 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 86%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060 (Laptop)
Device(1D05 1116) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.6589
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
93.9% Outstanding
Lighting 122
Reflection 162
Parallax 114
99% 133 fps
MRender 136
Gravity 93.8
Splatting 84.6
83% 105 fps
Poor: 67%
This bench: 93.9%
Great: 105%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ512HALU-00000 512GB
243GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXV7101Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1220 917 201 236 280 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
195% Outstanding
Read 1,354
Write 1,259
Mixed 1,137
SusWrite 526
240% 1,069 MB/s
4K Read 47.8
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 67.5
224% 79.2 MB/s
DQ Read 909
DQ Write 844
DQ Mixed 918
678% 891 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 195%
Great: 206%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFRA32A.M4FE 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (49th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
67% Good
MC Read 25.1
MC Write 24.9
MC Mixed 19
66% 23 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 33.4
SC Mixed 20.7
68% 23.7 GB/s
Latency 77.2
52% 77.2 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 67%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TULPAR T7 V20.3 Builds (Compare 601 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Battle cruiser

System: Monster TULPAR T7 V20.3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback