Monster TULPAR T7 V20.3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics21.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive160% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMonster TULPAR T7 V20.3  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER TULPAR T7 V20.3
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210219
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 18 '21 at 17:38
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
97.3% Outstanding
Memory 92.3
1-Core 138
2-Core 294
95% 175 Pts
4-Core 561
8-Core 737
83% 649 Pts
64-Core 1,008
62% 1,008 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 97.3%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060 (Laptop)
Device(1D05 1116) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.5749
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
21.6% Poor
Lighting 1.2
Reflection 1.7
Parallax 75.7
1% 26.2 fps
MRender 45.4
Gravity 94.3
Splatting 81.5
62% 73.7 fps
Poor: 67%
This bench: 21.6%
Great: 105%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ512HALU-00000 512GB
436GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXV7101Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1147 849 135 308 334 294 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
160% Outstanding
Read 1,224
Write 1,123
Mixed 1,038
SusWrite 511
218% 974 MB/s
4K Read 33.8
4K Write 80.5
4K Mixed 38.4
143% 50.9 MB/s
DQ Read 833
DQ Write 787
DQ Mixed 846
625% 822 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 160%
Great: 206%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFRA32A.M4FE 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (61st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
69.5% Good
MC Read 25.6
MC Write 25.9
MC Mixed 18.9
67% 23.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 34.2
SC Mixed 24.3
71% 25 GB/s
Latency 63.5
63% 63.5 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TULPAR T7 V20.3 Builds (Compare 601 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Battle cruiser

System: Monster TULPAR T7 V20.3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback