Asrock X99 Professional

Performance Results


Gaming 125% UFO	Desktop 96% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 113% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	132% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	287% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

Motherboard	Asrock X99 Professional (all builds)
Memory	12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180605
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 08 '21 at 03:00
Run Duration	191 Seconds
Run User	SVN-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130 101,694 User benchmarks, average bench 77% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	92.5% Outstanding	Memory 93.9 1-Core 104 2-Core 256 84% 151 Pts	4-Core 491 8-Core 760 77% 626 Pts	64-Core 1006 62% 1006 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 92.5% Great: 88%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% EVGA(3842 6696) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 457.30 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	132% Outstanding	Lighting 184 Reflection 194 Parallax 188 150% 189 fps	MRender 136 Gravity 186 Splatting 128 121% 150 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 132% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 367,854 User benchmarks, average bench 276% 236GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2305 781 777 782 785 784 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	287% Outstanding	Read 2,416 Write 2,107 Mixed 1604 SusWrite 1,036 400% 1,791 MB/s	4K Read 66.7 4K Write 156 4K Mixed 82.5 289% 102 MB/s	DQ Read 940 DQ Write 748 DQ Mixed 833 626% 840 MB/s
Poor: 178% ↑ This bench: 287% Great: 355%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$109 43,695 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 71GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 67 67 67 67 67 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	40.3% Average	Read 73.6 Write 62.3 Mixed 49.9 SusWrite 66.7 47% 63.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.7 138% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 40.3% Great: 69%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$47 218,164 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 153GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 87 84 87 89 87 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	49.5% Average	Read 85.4 Write 50.8 Mixed 50.7 SusWrite 86.9 50% 68.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.7 138% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 49.5% Great: 62%
Toshiba MK5055GSX 500GB-$33 4,927 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 11GB free Firmware: FG001M SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 37 36 37 38 38 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	21.2% Poor	Read 36.5 Write 38.3 Mixed 24.6 SusWrite 37.1 25% 34.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.5 91% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 21.2% Great: 42%
Hitachi HTS545050B9A300 500GB-$71 21,137 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 229GB free Firmware: PB4OCA1G SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 82 79 81 83 82 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	35.5% Below average	Read 42.3 Write 39.1 Mixed 22.5 SusWrite 81.2 34% 46.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.6 110% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 35.5% Great: 45%
Maxtor STM3250820AS 250GB 2,495 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 11GB free Firmware: 3.AAE SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 43 43 44 44 44 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	24.8% Poor	Read 43.1 Write 38.5 Mixed 28.5 SusWrite 43.1 28% 38.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 142% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 24.8% Great: 44%
WD Black 640GB (2008)-$25 19,988 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 199GB free Firmware: 01.03B01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 83 83 83 83 84 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	40.1% Average	Read 56.5 Write 45.1 Mixed 52 SusWrite 83 44% 59.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 156% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 40.1% Great: 65%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3000 C15 4x4GB 4,583 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 4 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	110% Outstanding	MC Read 42.4 MC Write 43.8 MC Mixed 40 120% 42.1 GB/s	SC Read 17.7 SC Write 24.1 SC Mixed 23.1 62% 21.6 GB/s	Latency 60 67% 60 ns
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 117%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99 Professional Builds (Compare 33 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 52%

Yacht

Desktop 82%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 46%

Yacht

Motherboard: Asrock X99 Professional

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	12x
Core i7-5930KIntel $150Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	12x
Xeon E5-1620 v4IntelBench 77%, 3,243 samples	3x

GPU
GTX 980Nvidia $500Bench 59%, 167,107 samples	11x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	2x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	2x

SSD
840 Evo 1TBSamsung $199Bench 105%, 23,857 samples	4x
MZVLB512HAJQ-000H7 512GBSamsungBench 216%, 1,262 samples	3x
730 Series 480GBIntel $230Bench 96%, 5,159 samples	2x

RAM
HyperX DDR4 3000 C15 4x4GBKingstonBench 90%, 4,583 samples	4x
Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2666 C15 4x4GBG.SKILLBench 89%, 1,983 samples	4x
Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2800 C16 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 94%, 975 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 37% - Below average

Total price: $829

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16