Asrock X99 Professional

Performance Results


Gaming 105% UFO	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 99% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	124% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	266% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

Motherboard	Asrock X99 Professional (all builds)
Memory	13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180605
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 09 '21 at 02:03
Run Duration	273 Seconds
Run User	SVN-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130 101,694 User benchmarks, average bench 77% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	83.9% Excellent	Memory 78.9 1-Core 130 2-Core 253 84% 154 Pts	4-Core 477 8-Core 812 78% 645 Pts	64-Core 1,053 65% 1,053 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 83.9% Great: 88%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% EVGA(3842 6696) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 461.09 Performing below potential (50^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	124% Outstanding	Lighting 166 Reflection 187 Parallax 177 135% 177 fps	MRender 134 Gravity 181 Splatting 126 119% 147 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 124% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 367,854 User benchmarks, average bench 276% 254GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2262 781 788 790 787 788 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	266% Outstanding	Read 2,297 Write 2,120 Mixed 1,616 SusWrite 1,033 396% 1,766 MB/s	4K Read 59.4 4K Write 133 4K Mixed 80.5 264% 91 MB/s	DQ Read 746 DQ Write 524 DQ Mixed 650 482% 640 MB/s
Poor: 178% ↑ This bench: 266% Great: 355%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$109 43,695 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 322GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 101 102 103 102 101 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	53.4% Above average	Read 84.4 Write 87.2 Mixed 66.1 SusWrite 102 63% 84.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.8 147% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 53.4% Great: 69%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$47 218,164 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 33GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 108 107 108 108 105 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	48.9% Average	Read 63 Write 71 Mixed 41.4 SusWrite 107 52% 70.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 132% 1 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 48.9% Great: 62%
Toshiba MK5055GSX 500GB-$33 4,927 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 20GB free Firmware: FG001M SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 38 38 39 39 39 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	22.1% Poor	Read 38 Write 35.9 Mixed 22.4 SusWrite 38.7 25% 33.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.4 80% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 22.1% Great: 42%
Hitachi HTS545050B9A300 500GB-$71 21,137 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 42GB free Firmware: PB4OCA1G SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 50 51 51 52 50 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	27% Poor	Read 43.3 Write 38.7 Mixed 24.6 SusWrite 50.7 29% 39.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.7 121% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 27% Great: 45%
Maxtor STM3250820AS 250GB 2,495 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 120GB free Firmware: 3.AAE SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 66 66 66 67 66 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	38.1% Below average	Read 66.1 Write 28.1 Mixed 40.1 SusWrite 66.3 37% 50.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 38.1% Great: 44%
WD Black 640GB (2008)-$25 19,988 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 430GB free Firmware: 01.03B01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 98 98 96 99 99 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	57.7% Above average	Read 103 Write 94.9 Mixed 77.4 SusWrite 98.2 69% 93.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.8 162% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 57.7% Great: 65%
SanDisk Extreme USB 3.0 32GB-$28 4,213 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 17GB free, PID 5580 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 92 92 92 93 92 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	90.6% Outstanding	Read 242 Write 63.3 Mixed 73.7 SusWrite 91 132% 118 MB/s	4K Read 11.9 4K Write 10.7 4K Mixed 7.9 677% 10.2 MB/s	DQ Read 12.7 DQ Write 12 DQ Mixed 10 795% 11.6 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 90.6% Great: 93%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3000 C15 4x4GB 4,583 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 4 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	66.5% Good	MC Read 25.6 MC Write 20.6 MC Mixed 28 71% 24.7 GB/s	SC Read 11.3 SC Write 18.8 SC Mixed 14.8 43% 15 GB/s	Latency 82.6 48% 82.6 ns
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 66.5% Great: 117%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99 Professional Builds (Compare 33 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 52%

Yacht

Desktop 82%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 46%

Yacht

Motherboard: Asrock X99 Professional

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	12x
Core i7-5930KIntel $599Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	12x
Xeon E5-1620 v4IntelBench 77%, 3,243 samples	3x

GPU
GTX 980Nvidia $500Bench 59%, 167,107 samples	11x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	2x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	2x

SSD
840 Evo 1TBSamsung $199Bench 105%, 23,857 samples	4x
MZVLB512HAJQ-000H7 512GBSamsungBench 216%, 1,262 samples	3x
730 Series 480GBIntel $230Bench 96%, 5,159 samples	2x

RAM
HyperX DDR4 3000 C15 4x4GBKingstonBench 90%, 4,583 samples	4x
Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2666 C15 4x4GBG.SKILLBench 89%, 1,983 samples	4x
Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2800 C16 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 94%, 975 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 37% - Below average

Total price: $829

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $44	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16