Asrock X99 Professional

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics128% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive281% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsrock X99 Professional  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180605
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 05 '21 at 05:13
Run Duration254 Seconds
Run User SVN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
75.5% Very good
Memory 83.3
1-Core 102
2-Core 202
74% 129 Pts
4-Core 364
8-Core 629
60% 496 Pts
64-Core 778
48% 778 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 442.74
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
128% Outstanding
Lighting 174
Reflection 288
Parallax 182
142% 215 fps
MRender 137
Gravity 181
Splatting 126
120% 148 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 128%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
254GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2278 785 785 783 789 785 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
281% Outstanding
Read 2,324
Write 2,181
Mixed 1,728
SusWrite 1,034
407% 1,817 MB/s
4K Read 63.4
4K Write 164
4K Mixed 86.8
294% 105 MB/s
DQ Read 842
DQ Write 677
DQ Mixed 752
565% 757 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 281%
Great: 355%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$109
322GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 102 101 102 101 103 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
53.2% Above average
Read 83.8
Write 80.4
Mixed 57.2
SusWrite 102
59% 80.8 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
129% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 69%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$47
42GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 106 106 90 83 108 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
53.3% Above average
Read 85.6
Write 81.6
Mixed 51.2
SusWrite 99.8
58% 79.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 62%
Toshiba MK5055GSX 500GB-$33
21GB free
Firmware: FG001M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 38 38 39 39 39 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
21.6% Poor
Read 36.3
Write 35.6
Mixed 22.2
SusWrite 38.8
24% 33.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.4
82% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 21.6%
Great: 42%
Hitachi HTS545050B9A300 500GB-$71
42GB free
Firmware: PB4OCA1G
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 50 51 51 52 51 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
27% Poor
Read 43.5
Write 42.2
Mixed 23.4
SusWrite 50.5
29% 39.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
121% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 27%
Great: 45%
Maxtor STM3250820AS 250GB
120GB free
Firmware: 3.AAE
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 67 67 66 67 68 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
38.2% Below average
Read 66.4
Write 30.4
Mixed 40.3
SusWrite 66.6
38% 50.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
151% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 44%
WD Black 640GB (2008)-$25
405GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 99 93 98 99 98 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
57.4% Above average
Read 104
Write 96.9
Mixed 65.5
SusWrite 96
67% 90.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
181% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3000 C15 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
94.9% Outstanding
MC Read 37.2
MC Write 38.6
MC Mixed 34
105% 36.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 19.2
SC Mixed 19.8
51% 17.9 GB/s
Latency 74.6
54% 74.6 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 94.9%
Great: 117%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99 Professional Builds (Compare 33 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asrock X99 Professional

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 37% - Below average Total price: $829
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback