Asrock X99 Professional

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics132% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsrock X99 Professional  (all builds)
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180605
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 22 '21 at 18:25
Run Duration255 Seconds
Run User SVN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
77.7% Very good
Memory 83.8
1-Core 99
2-Core 195
72% 126 Pts
4-Core 386
8-Core 621
62% 503 Pts
64-Core 784
48% 784 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 461.09
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
132% Outstanding
Lighting 183
Reflection 193
Parallax 205
149% 194 fps
MRender 137
Gravity 186
Splatting 128
122% 151 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 132%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
124GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,353
Write 2,185
Mixed 1,733
465% 2,090 MB/s
4K Read 63.1
4K Write 157
4K Mixed 86.3
290% 102 MB/s
DQ Read 851
DQ Write 673
DQ Mixed 755
567% 760 MB/s
Poor: 178% Great: 355%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$109
71GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 66 68 68 67 67 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
38.5% Below average
Read 67.4
Write 64.1
Mixed 76.5
SusWrite 66.7
51% 68.7 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.6
125% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 69%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$47
38GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 86 87 88 87 88 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
50.3% Above average
Read 87.4
Write 81.3
Mixed 49.2
SusWrite 87.5
56% 76.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
129% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 62%
Toshiba MK5055GSX 500GB-$33
20GB free
Firmware: FG001M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 38 40 40 40 40 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
21.4% Poor
Read 34.8
Write 37.6
Mixed 23.5
SusWrite 39.4
25% 33.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
91% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 21.4%
Great: 42%
Hitachi HTS545050B9A300 500GB-$71
402GB free
Firmware: PB4OCA1G
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 50 51 50 50 51 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
27.8% Poor
Read 46.6
Write 42.9
Mixed 25
SusWrite 49.9
30% 41.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
119% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 45%
Maxtor STM3250820AS 250GB
233GB free
Firmware: 3.AAE
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 75 75 75 74 74 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
43.5% Average
Read 77.1
Write 69.4
Mixed 44.7
SusWrite 74.5
49% 66.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 44%
WD Black 640GB (2008)-$25
596GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 106 103 105 105 105 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
60.7% Good
Read 107
Write 101
Mixed 76.7
SusWrite 104
72% 97.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
187% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3000 C15 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
95.1% Outstanding
MC Read 37.2
MC Write 38.8
MC Mixed 33.8
105% 36.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 18.9
SC Mixed 20
52% 18.1 GB/s
Latency 73.7
54% 73.7 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 95.1%
Great: 117%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99 Professional Builds (Compare 33 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asrock X99 Professional

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 37% - Below average Total price: $829
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback