TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Acer Predator PH315-53

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics88.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive245% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemAcer Predator PH315-53  (all builds)
MotherboardCML QX50_CMS
Memory21 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200427
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateMar 28 '21 at 11:36
Run Duration210 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
84.2% Excellent
Memory 79.6
1-Core 129
2-Core 216
80% 142 Pts
4-Core 477
8-Core 766
76% 621 Pts
64-Core 986
61% 986 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑
This bench: 84.2%
 Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design
Acer(1025 1442) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.6089
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
88.4% Excellent
Lighting 107
Reflection 109
Parallax 122
87% 112 fps
MRender 138
Gravity 105
Splatting 98.2
91% 114 fps
Poor: 62% ↑
This bench: 88.4%
 Great: 90%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$159
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1555 1684 1731 1755 1729 1562 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
245% Outstanding
Read 1,448
Write 2,048
Mixed 1,405
SusWrite 1,669
372% 1,642 MB/s
4K Read 47.7
4K Write 83.3
4K Mixed 60.6
194% 63.9 MB/s
DQ Read 618
DQ Write 475
DQ Mixed 547
409% 547 MB/s
Poor: 223% ↑
This bench: 245%
 Great: 435%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$139
489GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 406 427 432 436 444 441 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 480
Write 435
Mixed 411
SusWrite 431
99% 439 MB/s
4K Read 34.9
4K Write 62.3
4K Mixed 44.7
143% 47.3 MB/s
DQ Read 338
DQ Write 291
DQ Mixed 313
235% 314 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑
This bench: 104%
 Great: 133%
Samsung MZVLB256HBHQ-00007 256GB
145GB free
Firmware: EXH7202Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1345 403 405 405 406 402 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
181% Outstanding
Read 1,445
Write 2,040
Mixed 1,213
SusWrite 561
296% 1,315 MB/s
4K Read 47.5
4K Write 88.5
4K Mixed 61.2
197% 65.7 MB/s
DQ Read 705
DQ Write 531
DQ Mixed 612
459% 616 MB/s
Poor: 107% ↑
This bench: 181%
 Great: 252%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4SFD8266.C16FD1 Hynix HMAA2GS6AJR8N-XN 32GB
2667, 3200 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
76.3% Very good
MC Read 30.4
MC Write 29.8
MC Mixed 22.9
79% 27.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 28.3
SC Mixed 21.1
62% 21.5 GB/s
Latency 81.4
49% 81.4 ns
Poor: 76% ↑
This bench: 76.3%
 Great: 82%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Predator PH315-53 Builds (Compare 6,112 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Predator PH315-53

CPU
Core i7-10750HIntelBench 77%, 206,796 samples4,179x
Core i7-10870HIntelBench 79%, 23,498 samples1,009x
Core i5-10300HIntelBench 74%, 82,821 samples861x
GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 187,969 samples3,002x
RTX 2060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 71%, 119,687 samples1,146x
RTX 3060 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 90%, 102,706 samples811x
SSD
PC SN730 SDBQNTY-512G-1014 512GBWDCBench 179%, 2,900 samples988x
PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00-1014 1TBWDCBench 219%, 2,501 samples632x
PC SN730 SDBQNTY-256G-1014 256GBWDCBench 153%, 1,070 samples543x
RAM
M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 86%, 69,946 samples1,920x
M471A2K43DB1-CWE 1x16GBSamsungBench 49%, 13,312 samples551x
HMAA2GS6AJR8N-XN 1x16GBHynixBench 45%, 4,229 samples536x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback