HP Z800 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.04% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive22.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Z800 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0AECh
Memory44.7 GB free of 48.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180305
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateMar 28 '21 at 09:12
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User BIH-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5690
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.45 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
76% Very good
Memory 84.1
1-Core 94.5
2-Core 185
70% 121 Pts
4-Core 366
8-Core 583
58% 474 Pts
64-Core 1,354
84% 1,354 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 76%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 2000
HP(103C 084A) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.00
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
6.04% Terrible
Lighting 7
Reflection 9.5
Parallax 6.7
6% 7.73 fps
MRender 9.7
Gravity 8.2
Splatting 7.1
7% 8.33 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.04%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$28
86GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 162 75 57 59 43 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
22.7% Poor
Read 235
Write 189
Mixed 202
SusWrite 92.4
40% 180 MB/s
4K Read 16.3
4K Write 6.6
4K Mixed 0.5
29% 7.8 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 22.7%
Great: 92%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
34GB free
Firmware: KC65
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 107 111 112 112 112 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
58.9% Above average
Read 94.7
Write 94.3
Mixed 53.9
SusWrite 111
65% 88.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
126% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 88%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$25
106GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 95 97 97 97 100 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
49.6% Average
Read 75.8
Write 76.7
Mixed 47.1
SusWrite 97
54% 74.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 69%
WD Blue 250GB (2010)-$37
223GB free
Firmware: 18.01H18
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 117 117 117 118 118 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
66.8% Good
Read 116
Write 100
Mixed 60.9
SusWrite 117
72% 98.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
142% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 70%
WD Blue 250GB (2010)-$37
233GB free
Firmware: 18.01H18
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 125 125 126 127 126 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
72.1% Very good
Read 126
Write 124
Mixed 67.6
SusWrite 125
81% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 AD HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD H... 82GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 34816 MB
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
50.4% Above average
MC Read 21.9
MC Write 16.7
MC Mixed 18.2
54% 18.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 7.5
22% 7.73 GB/s
Latency 73.2
55% 73.2 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z800 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,952 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z800 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback