Asus PRIME Z370-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics33.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive269% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z370-A  (all builds)
Memory26.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210113
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 24 '21 at 06:09
Run Duration271 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$188
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
94.2% Outstanding
Memory 85.6
1-Core 117
2-Core 255
84% 153 Pts
4-Core 552
8-Core 886
88% 719 Pts
64-Core 1,157
72% 1,157 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 94.2%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Zotac(19DA 2375) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1443 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.72
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
33.4% Below average
Lighting 42.7
Reflection 45.4
Parallax 40.4
35% 42.8 fps
MRender 36.9
Gravity 40.9
Splatting 35.7
31% 37.8 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 33.4%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$90
323GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1077 1063 1080 1081 1083 1061 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
269% Outstanding
Read 2,498
Write 2,195
Mixed 1,879
SusWrite 1,074
428% 1,912 MB/s
4K Read 50.8
4K Write 125
4K Mixed 62.2
223% 79.5 MB/s
DQ Read 998
DQ Write 575
DQ Mixed 781
583% 785 MB/s
Poor: 210%
This bench: 269%
Great: 429%
Adata SP900 256GB-$300
117GB free
Firmware: 5.8.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 202 212 219 240 197 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
87.9% Excellent
Read 413
Write 290
Mixed 303
SusWrite 211
68% 304 MB/s
4K Read 32.8
4K Write 88.6
4K Mixed 42.2
151% 54.5 MB/s
DQ Read 267
DQ Write 269
DQ Mixed 237
187% 258 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 89%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
108GB free
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1206 398 300 299 299 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
198% Outstanding
Read 1,503
Write 1,229
Mixed 564
SusWrite 467
209% 941 MB/s
4K Read 46.2
4K Write 137
4K Mixed 62
222% 81.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,106
DQ Write 716
DQ Mixed 632
546% 818 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 198%
Great: 236%
Crucial MX100 256GB-$116
140GB free
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 330 330 330 330 325 325 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
93.1% Outstanding
Read 433
Write 327
Mixed 313
SusWrite 328
79% 350 MB/s
4K Read 30
4K Write 92.2
4K Mixed 40.3
146% 54.2 MB/s
DQ Read 173
DQ Write 309
DQ Mixed 181
154% 221 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 93.1%
Great: 97%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119
1TB free
Firmware: 1AQ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 105 105 106 105 105 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
49.6% Average
Read 70.9
Write 37
Mixed 58.8
SusWrite 102
50% 67.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
192% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 72%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 208 209 212 209 206 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 170
Write 101
Mixed 80.9
SusWrite 205
102% 139 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
97% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 108%
Great: 106%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$83
2TB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 194 195 196 196 194 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 180
Write 156
Mixed 28.1
SusWrite 193
100% 139 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 1.9
351% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 107%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
GEIL CL15-15-15 D4-2133 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
70.8% Very good
MC Read 26.2
MC Write 27.7
MC Mixed 21.5
72% 25.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 28
SC Mixed 19.8
60% 21 GB/s
Latency 71.5
56% 71.5 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME Z370-A Builds (Compare 11,333 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 110%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 100%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z370-A - $132

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $930
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback