Asus PRIME Z370-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics31.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive245% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z370-A  (all builds)
Memory24.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210113
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMar 23 '21 at 12:47
Run Duration272 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$188
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
88.6% Excellent
Memory 84.4
1-Core 140
2-Core 263
90% 162 Pts
4-Core 498
8-Core 868
83% 683 Pts
64-Core 1077
67% 1077 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 88.6%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Zotac(19DA 2375) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1443 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.72
Performing below potential (46th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
31.8% Below average
Lighting 40.3
Reflection 43.4
Parallax 38.4
33% 40.7 fps
MRender 35.3
Gravity 39.3
Splatting 34.6
30% 36.4 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 31.8%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$90
323GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1037 1071 1062 1063 1048 1041 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
245% Outstanding
Read 2,096
Write 1091
Mixed 916
SusWrite 1,053
286% 1,289 MB/s
4K Read 49
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 60.4
214% 75.8 MB/s
DQ Read 888
DQ Write 505
DQ Mixed 696
518% 697 MB/s
Poor: 210%
This bench: 245%
Great: 429%
Adata SP900 256GB-$300
117GB free
Firmware: 5.8.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 221 190 205 214 206 201 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
84.6% Excellent
Read 375
Write 282
Mixed 288
SusWrite 206
64% 288 MB/s
4K Read 32.4
4K Write 85.1
4K Mixed 40.8
146% 52.8 MB/s
DQ Read 267
DQ Write 261
DQ Mixed 257
195% 262 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 89%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
108GB free
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1035 531 300 300 300 299 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
177% Outstanding
Read 1,236
Write 1,045
Mixed 525
SusWrite 461
182% 817 MB/s
4K Read 44.6
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 56.6
205% 74.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,002
DQ Write 646
DQ Mixed 618
517% 756 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 177%
Great: 236%
Crucial MX100 256GB-$116
140GB free
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 317 332 331 330 328 330 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
90.9% Outstanding
Read 415
Write 329
Mixed 299
SusWrite 328
77% 343 MB/s
4K Read 29.8
4K Write 85
4K Mixed 39.6
141% 51.5 MB/s
DQ Read 171
DQ Write 307
DQ Mixed 180
154% 219 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 90.9%
Great: 97%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119
1TB free
Firmware: 1AQ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 106 106 106 105 105 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
59.5% Above average
Read 106
Write 41.3
Mixed 54.4
SusWrite 102
56% 75.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
168% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 72%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 126 128 127 125 126 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
77.1% Very good
Read 144
Write 145
Mixed 80.9
SusWrite 124
91% 124 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
106% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 106%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$83
2TB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 195 194 195 190 193 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
98.8% Outstanding
Read 152
Write 149
Mixed 29.9
SusWrite 192
94% 131 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 2
364% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 98.8%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
GEIL CL15-15-15 D4-2133 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
72.2% Very good
MC Read 26
MC Write 27.9
MC Mixed 21.9
72% 25.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 30.5
SC Mixed 23.2
67% 23.4 GB/s
Latency 72.7
55% 72.7 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME Z370-A Builds (Compare 11,333 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 110%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 100%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z370-A - $132

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $930
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback