Asus PRIME Z370-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics33.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive244% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z370-A  (all builds)
Memory24.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210113
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMar 23 '21 at 13:04
Run Duration272 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$188
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
86.1% Excellent
Memory 84.2
1-Core 138
2-Core 271
90% 164 Pts
4-Core 472
8-Core 832
79% 652 Pts
64-Core 1,061
66% 1,061 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Zotac(19DA 2375) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1443 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.72
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
33.1% Below average
Lighting 42.3
Reflection 45.4
Parallax 40.3
34% 42.7 fps
MRender 35.9
Gravity 40.4
Splatting 35.4
30% 37.2 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$90
323GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1054 1082 1078 1079 1083 1076 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
244% Outstanding
Read 2,098
Write 1,053
Mixed 1,027
SusWrite 1,075
292% 1,313 MB/s
4K Read 48
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 56.6
205% 72.7 MB/s
DQ Read 888
DQ Write 506
DQ Mixed 692
516% 695 MB/s
Poor: 210%
This bench: 244%
Great: 429%
Adata SP900 256GB-$300
117GB free
Firmware: 5.8.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 212 201 205 201 221 216 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
84.6% Excellent
Read 361
Write 284
Mixed 293
SusWrite 210
64% 287 MB/s
4K Read 33.5
4K Write 84.6
4K Mixed 40.9
148% 53 MB/s
DQ Read 267
DQ Write 261
DQ Mixed 261
197% 263 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 89%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
108GB free
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1012 550 299 299 298 298 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
174% Outstanding
Read 1,194
Write 1,012
Mixed 538
SusWrite 459
178% 801 MB/s
4K Read 45
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 51.7
202% 74.9 MB/s
DQ Read 992
DQ Write 653
DQ Mixed 694
553% 780 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 174%
Great: 236%
Crucial MX100 256GB-$116
140GB free
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 322 331 331 332 334 329 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
91.1% Outstanding
Read 428
Write 321
Mixed 275
SusWrite 330
76% 338 MB/s
4K Read 29.4
4K Write 85.1
4K Mixed 39.1
140% 51.2 MB/s
DQ Read 172
DQ Write 308
DQ Mixed 182
154% 220 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 91.1%
Great: 97%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119
1TB free
Firmware: 1AQ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 104 106 106 105 105 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
55.9% Above average
Read 92.9
Write 25.2
Mixed 46.2
SusWrite 102
49% 66.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
179% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 72%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 204 209 213 213 208 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 150
Write 179
Mixed 82
SusWrite 207
113% 154 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.1
95% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 102%
Great: 106%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$83
2TB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 195 195 196 194 193 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
99.2% Outstanding
Read 153
Write 156
Mixed 29.9
SusWrite 191
96% 133 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 2
364% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 99.2%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
GEIL CL15-15-15 D4-2133 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
69.4% Good
MC Read 25.4
MC Write 26.7
MC Mixed 21.1
70% 24.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 27
SC Mixed 23
62% 21.6 GB/s
Latency 73.1
55% 73.1 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME Z370-A Builds (Compare 11,333 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 110%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 100%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z370-A - $132

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $930
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback