Acer Predator PO9-600

Performance Results


Gaming 108% UFO	Desktop 93% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 100% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	118% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	128% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Acer Predator PO9-600 (all builds)
Motherboard	American Predator PO9-600
Memory	53.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190307
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Mar 23 '21 at 13:48
Run Duration	430 Seconds
Run User	CHE-User
Background CPU	14%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$175 746,287 User benchmarks, average bench 88% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	90.1% Outstanding	Memory 86.3 1-Core 136 2-Core 274 91% 165 Pts	4-Core 504 8-Core 809 81% 657 Pts	64-Core 1,069 66% 1,069 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 90.1% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Sapphire(174B 1470) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 461.40 Performing below potential (22^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	118% Outstanding	Lighting 157 Reflection 180 Parallax 165 128% 167 fps	MRender 127 Gravity 169 Splatting 118 111% 138 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 118% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$125 20,782 User benchmarks, average bench 128% 301GB free (System drive) Firmware: PSF109C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 528 538 469 176 99 98 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	128% Outstanding	Read 846 Write 547 Mixed 619 SusWrite 318 130% 582 MB/s	4K Read 31.7 4K Write 109 4K Mixed 46.9 166% 62.6 MB/s	DQ Read 502 DQ Write 530 DQ Mixed 460 362% 498 MB/s
Poor: 95% ↑ This bench: 128% Great: 144%
Ocz-vert EX450 256GB 39 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 152GB free Firmware: 1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 203 208 208 209 208 210 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	72.1% Very good	Read 406 Write 392 Mixed 334 SusWrite 208 75% 335 MB/s	4K Read 18.9 4K Write 60.2 4K Mixed 26.3 94% 35.1 MB/s	DQ Read 317 DQ Write 316 DQ Mixed 289 225% 308 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 72.1% Great: 103%
XPG SX95 0U 960GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 183GB free Firmware: Q092 SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 209 210 212 211 212 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	81.7% Excellent	Read 487 Write 378 Mixed 368 SusWrite 210 81% 361 MB/s	4K Read 24.9 4K Write 72.3 4K Mixed 37.5 124% 44.9 MB/s	DQ Read 212 DQ Write 265 DQ Mixed 257 189% 245 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 81.7% Great: 79%
XPG SX95 0U 960GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 841GB free Firmware: Q092 SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 204 204 205 203 205 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	80.8% Excellent	Read 482 Write 380 Mixed 372 SusWrite 204 80% 359 MB/s	4K Read 23.9 4K Write 70.4 4K Mixed 38.6 123% 44.3 MB/s	DQ Read 204 DQ Write 265 DQ Mixed 198 160% 222 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 80.8% Great: 79%
XPG SX95 0U 960GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 355GB free Firmware: Q092 SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 210 210 211 211 212 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	80.1% Excellent	Read 486 Write 377 Mixed 368 SusWrite 210 81% 360 MB/s	4K Read 25.4 4K Write 71.2 4K Mixed 37.8 125% 44.8 MB/s	DQ Read 136 DQ Write 264 DQ Mixed 256 178% 219 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 80.1% Great: 79%
WD Gold 4TB (2016)-$99 4,829 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 904GB free Firmware: 01.01M03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 136 130 133 139 134 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	73.7% Very good	Read 121 Write 131 Mixed 69.7 SusWrite 135 84% 114 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 4.7 4K Mixed 0.6 187% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 73.7% Great: 111%
WD Gold 4TB (2016)-$99 4,829 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 3.5TB free Firmware: 01.01M03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 188 181 198 186 193 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	Read 165 Write 165 Mixed 73.8 SusWrite 190 108% 148 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 5.1 4K Mixed 0.6 203% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 111%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$55 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 284GB free Firmware: 0107 SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 22 22 23 23 22 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	17.9% Very poor	Read 39.3 Write 40 Mixed 30.5 SusWrite 22.3 24% 33 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 156% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 17.9% Great: 67%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50 170,877 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 446GB free Firmware: 0107 SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 12 13 12 11 12 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	14.5% Very poor	Read 37.5 Write 40.7 Mixed 31.2 SusWrite 12.3 23% 30.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.8 167% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 14.5% Great: 84%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$90 55,507 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 2TB free Firmware: 0107 SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.1 5.8 6.7 6.2 5.7 5.7 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	12.9% Very poor	Read 37.8 Write 38.3 Mixed 36 SusWrite 6.2 22% 29.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1.1 206% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 12.9% Great: 100%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$176 41,439 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0107 SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.4 5.8 6.7 6.2 5.7 5.7 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	13.2% Very poor	Read 39 Write 39.5 Mixed 35 SusWrite 6.2 22% 29.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.8 165% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 13.2% Great: 63%
WDC WD10 EALX-009BA0 1TB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 174GB free, PID 2773 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 18 18 18 18 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	15.7% Very poor	Read 35 Write 33.5 Mixed 27.5 SusWrite 18.2 38% 28.5 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.8 102% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 15.7% Great: 53%
WDC WD20 EZRX-22D8PB0 2TB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 58GB free, PID 2773 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.1 2 2 2.1 2.2 2.4 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	8.9% Terrible	Read 23.5 Write 36.2 Mixed 22.5 SusWrite 2.1 28% 21.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 8.9% Great: 48%
WDC WD20 EZRX-00D8PB0 2TB 77 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.1 9.3 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	14.7% Very poor	Read 35.2 Write 36.5 Mixed 28 SusWrite 9.1 36% 27.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.9 115% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 14.7% Great: 59%
Seagate Portable 500GB 3,247 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 466GB free, PID 2300 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 38 38 38 38 38 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	17.9% Very poor	Read 37.2 Write 34.7 Mixed 25.8 SusWrite 38.4 46% 34 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.7 70% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 17.9% Great: 19%
WDC WD20 EZRX-00D8PB0 2TB 77 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 177GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 35.5 Write 37.2 Mixed 26.7 42% 33.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.9 112% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 59%
WDC WD20 EARS-00MVWB0 2TB 91 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 728GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.1 1.2 9.1 9.7 9.2 9.4 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	13.2% Very poor	Read 35.7 Write 36.5 Mixed 27.3 SusWrite 6.6 34% 26.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.6 94% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 13.2% Great: 48%
WDC WD20 EZRX-00D8PB0 2TB 77 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 196GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 1.3 1.2 1.2 1.3 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	12.9% Very poor	Read 35.2 Write 37.5 Mixed 29.7 SusWrite 0.8 33% 25.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1 119% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 12.9% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston ACR26D4U9D8MH-16 4x16GB 26 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing below potential (36^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	87% Excellent	MC Read 30.5 MC Write 35 MC Mixed 27.1 88% 30.9 GB/s	SC Read 19.4 SC Write 36.7 SC Mixed 26.9 79% 27.7 GB/s	Latency 71.1 56% 71.1 ns
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 87% Great: 114%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Predator PO9-600 Builds (Compare 112 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 109%

UFO

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 100%

Nuclear submarine

System: Acer Predator PO9-600

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel $175Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	108x
Core i5-8400Intel $114Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	3x
Core i5-8600KIntel $125Bench 91%, 264,837 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	40x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	20x
RTX 2080Nvidia $270Bench 124%, 316,424 samples	19x

SSD
600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $125Bench 128%, 20,782 samples	20x
600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBIntel $49Bench 116%, 58,154 samples	20x
RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1 256GBKingstonBench 100%, 13,793 samples	9x

RAM
ACR26D4U9S8MH-8 2x8GBKingstonBench 75%, 687 samples	24x
ACR26D4U9S8MH-8 4x8GBKingstonBench 83%, 176 samples	14x
ACR26D4U9S8ME-8 2x8GBKingstonBench 78%, 1,446 samples	12x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $785

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16