Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 160%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 179%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics160% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive267% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory56.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201021
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMar 22 '21 at 03:53
Run Duration323 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 25%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
99.6% Outstanding
Memory 84.7
1-Core 156
2-Core 310
99% 184 Pts
4-Core 612
8-Core 1,134
104% 873 Pts
64-Core 2207
137% 2207 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 99.6%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 461.92
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
160% Outstanding
Lighting 216
Reflection 205
Parallax 236
176% 219 fps
MRender 260
Gravity 220
Splatting 172
173% 218 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 160%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Force MP600 500GB
378GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EGFM11.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1101 496 501 506 503 508 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
267% Outstanding
Read 2,090
Write 2,389
Mixed 1881
SusWrite 602
391% 1,740 MB/s
4K Read 56.6
4K Write 203
4K Mixed 83.7
300% 114 MB/s
DQ Read 1,363
DQ Write 1,060
DQ Mixed 1,249
924% 1,224 MB/s
Poor: 152%
This bench: 267%
Great: 374%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
434GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 459 459 459 459 445 297 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 446
Mixed 443
SusWrite 430
102% 454 MB/s
4K Read 40.8
4K Write 92.1
4K Mixed 53.9
180% 62.3 MB/s
DQ Read 218
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 199
150% 201 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 111%
Great: 129%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$139
709GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 459 459 459 459 459 454 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 501
Write 446
Mixed 441
SusWrite 458
104% 462 MB/s
4K Read 40.7
4K Write 92.1
4K Mixed 55.2
181% 62.7 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 200
150% 201 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 114%
Great: 133%
SSD 1TB
880GB free
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 415 415 425 441 421 121 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
92.1% Outstanding
Read 470
Write 302
Mixed 326
SusWrite 373
82% 368 MB/s
4K Read 31.6
4K Write 85.1
4K Mixed 37.2
141% 51.3 MB/s
DQ Read 148
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 152
119% 162 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 92.1%
Great: 103%
Corsair Force NVMe PCIe M.2 960GB
369GB free
Firmware: ECFM13.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2538 2574 1951 1059 1063 1060 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
318% Outstanding
Read 1,662
Write 2392
Mixed 1,827
SusWrite 1,708
430% 1,897 MB/s
4K Read 46.4
4K Write 174
4K Mixed 78.7
263% 99.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,543
DQ Write 1,389
DQ Mixed 1,434
1,084% 1,455 MB/s
Poor: 150%
This bench: 318%
Great: 298%
Seagate BUP Slim 1TB
693GB free
Firmware: 0004
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 124 127 129 129 124 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
61.8% Good
Read 89.6
Write 119
Mixed 84.2
SusWrite 126
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 1
146% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
124% Outstanding
MC Read 50.9
MC Write 45.1
MC Mixed 43.1
132% 46.4 GB/s
SC Read 28.4
SC Write 26.5
SC Mixed 40.7
91% 31.9 GB/s
Latency 72.3
55% 72.3 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 124%
Great: 139%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,876 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $192

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $1,037
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback