Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 160%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 179%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics162% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive271% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory59.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201021
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 17 '21 at 11:06
Run Duration323 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
98.8% Outstanding
Memory 84.1
1-Core 155
2-Core 307
98% 182 Pts
4-Core 608
8-Core 1,106
103% 857 Pts
64-Core 2,192
136% 2,192 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 98.8%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 466.27
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
162% Outstanding
Lighting 220
Reflection 205
Parallax 238
179% 221 fps
MRender 260
Gravity 221
Splatting 172
173% 218 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 162%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Force MP600 500GB
371GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EGFM11.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1453 502 494 504 505 503 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
271% Outstanding
Read 2080
Write 2,391
Mixed 1,919
SusWrite 660
396% 1,763 MB/s
4K Read 49.2
4K Write 209
4K Mixed 85.1
294% 114 MB/s
DQ Read 1,411
DQ Write 1,108
DQ Mixed 1277
951% 1,265 MB/s
Poor: 152%
This bench: 271%
Great: 374%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
434GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 411 457 455 456 455 296 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 501
Write 442
Mixed 448
SusWrite 422
102% 453 MB/s
4K Read 41.1
4K Write 91
4K Mixed 54.9
181% 62.3 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 199
150% 201 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 111%
Great: 129%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
709GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 411 456 455 456 455 429 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 503
Write 445
Mixed 447
SusWrite 444
104% 460 MB/s
4K Read 41
4K Write 93.3
4K Mixed 42.8
166% 59 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 199
150% 201 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 107%
Great: 133%
SSD 1TB
880GB free
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 421 428 428 434 436 434 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
50.3% Above average
Read 200
Write 105
Mixed 88.3
SusWrite 430
47% 206 MB/s
4K Read 17.6
4K Write 19.9
4K Mixed 11.2
52% 16.2 MB/s
DQ Read 14.3
DQ Write 15.6
DQ Mixed 14.9
11% 14.9 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 103%
Corsair Force NVMe PCIe M.2 960GB
260GB free
Firmware: ECFM13.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2519 2492 1998 1059 1054 1000 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
319% Outstanding
Read 1,712
Write 2,096
Mixed 1,857
SusWrite 1687
416% 1,838 MB/s
4K Read 46.4
4K Write 176
4K Mixed 79.6
266% 101 MB/s
DQ Read 1520
DQ Write 1,389
DQ Mixed 1,433
1,081% 1,447 MB/s
Poor: 150%
This bench: 319%
Great: 298%
Seagate BUP Slim 1TB
672GB free
Firmware: 0004
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 121 126 127 127 119 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
59.7% Above average
Read 84.8
Write 117
Mixed 84.3
SusWrite 124
76% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 1
146% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
122% Outstanding
MC Read 49.6
MC Write 43.6
MC Mixed 42.8
130% 45.3 GB/s
SC Read 29
SC Write 26.8
SC Mixed 41.1
92% 32.3 GB/s
Latency 73.3
55% 73.3 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 122%
Great: 139%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,799 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $192

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $937
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback