Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 160%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 181%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics162% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive263% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory56.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201021
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateMay 14 '21 at 08:10
Run Duration324 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 27%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
98.5% Outstanding
Memory 83.6
1-Core 154
2-Core 309
98% 182 Pts
4-Core 607
8-Core 1,185
106% 896 Pts
64-Core 2,200
136% 2,200 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 98.5%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 466.27
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
162% Outstanding
Lighting 220
Reflection 206
Parallax 237
180% 221 fps
MRender 261
Gravity 221
Splatting 167
172% 216 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 162%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Force MP600 500GB
378GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EGFM11.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 855 500 504 505 505 507 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
263% Outstanding
Read 2,093
Write 2,290
Mixed 1,910
SusWrite 563
385% 1,714 MB/s
4K Read 56
4K Write 201
4K Mixed 83.6
298% 113 MB/s
DQ Read 1,338
DQ Write 1,042
DQ Mixed 1,233
911% 1,205 MB/s
Poor: 152%
This bench: 263%
Great: 374%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
434GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 454 454 455 455 449 294 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 501
Write 446
Mixed 445
SusWrite 427
102% 455 MB/s
4K Read 40.8
4K Write 91.1
4K Mixed 54.3
180% 62.1 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 200
150% 201 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 111%
Great: 129%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
709GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 454 454 455 455 454 453 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 503
Write 446
Mixed 447
SusWrite 454
104% 462 MB/s
4K Read 40.7
4K Write 92
4K Mixed 54.8
181% 62.5 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 200
150% 201 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 113%
Great: 133%
SSD 1TB
880GB free
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 401 409 408 436 433 434 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
53.2% Above average
Read 277
Write 105
Mixed 89
SusWrite 420
50% 223 MB/s
4K Read 17.5
4K Write 20.2
4K Mixed 12
53% 16.6 MB/s
DQ Read 14.5
DQ Write 16.2
DQ Mixed 15.3
12% 15.3 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 103%
Corsair Force NVMe PCIe M.2 960GB
260GB free
Firmware: ECFM13.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2537 2573 1392 1051 1052 1041 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
312% Outstanding
Read 1,674
Write 2,329
Mixed 1,843
SusWrite 1,608
422% 1,863 MB/s
4K Read 46
4K Write 172
4K Mixed 78.2
261% 98.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,558
DQ Write 1,391
DQ Mixed 1461
1,099% 1470 MB/s
Poor: 150%
This bench: 312%
Great: 298%
Seagate BUP Slim 1TB
675GB free
Firmware: 0004
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 121 126 127 127 123 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
59.6% Above average
Read 84.2
Write 117
Mixed 84.2
SusWrite 124
76% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 1
146% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
124% Outstanding
MC Read 51
MC Write 45.1
MC Mixed 43.1
133% 46.4 GB/s
SC Read 28
SC Write 27
SC Mixed 40.1
91% 31.7 GB/s
Latency 74.2
54% 74.2 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 124%
Great: 139%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,772 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $192

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $932
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback