Asus 900

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive4.25% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
MemoryThe RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus 900  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK 900
Memory0.6 GB free of 1 GB @ 0.4 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20080526
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 19 '21 at 12:22
Run Duration197 Seconds
Run User IRQ-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron M processor 900MHz
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 0.9 GHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
21.5% Poor
Memory 41.9
1-Core 8.7
2-Core 8.4
17% 19.7 Pts
4-Core 8.7
8-Core 8.6
1% 8.65 Pts
64-Core 8.8
0% 8.8 Pts
Poor: 10%
This bench: 21.5%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Asus-phison SSD 16GB
2GB free (System drive)
Firmware: TST2.04P
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.7 8.2 7 6 4.7 4.6 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
4.25% Terrible
Read 29.3
Write 11.3
Mixed 6.5
SusWrite 6
3% 13.3 MB/s
4K Read 6.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
10% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.25%
Great: 5%
Asus-phison OB SSD 4GB
1GB free
Firmware: TST2.04P
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.2 8.3 7.3 6.1 5.8 5.6 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
4.07% Terrible
Read 37.3
Write 19.6
Mixed 13.3
SusWrite 6.5
4% 19.2 MB/s
4K Read 5.3
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
8% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 0%
This bench: 4.07%
Great: 4%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 32GB-$16
5GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 18 16 13 14 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
10.2% Very poor
Read 28.8
Write 17.3
Mixed 18.6
SusWrite 15.2
25% 20 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.9
65% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.2%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x1GB
1 of 1 slots used
1GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
6.61% Terrible
MC Read 2.1
MC Write 1.9
MC Mixed 1.6
5% 1.87 GB/s
SC Read 2.2
SC Write 1.9
SC Mixed 1.3
5% 1.8 GB/s
Latency 194
21% 194 ns
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.61%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback