Asus 900

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive5.06% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
MemoryThe RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemAsus 900  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK 900
Memory0.4 GB free of 1 GB @ 0.4 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20080707
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 27 '17 at 21:07
Run Duration429 Seconds
Run User SRB-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron M processor 900MHz
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 0.9 GHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
22.2% Poor
Memory 43.4
1-Core 8.7
2-Core 8.3
17% 20.1 Pts
4-Core 8.6
8-Core 9
1% 8.8 Pts
64-Core 8.7
0% 8.7 Pts
Poor: 10%
This bench: 22.2%
Great: 39%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Asus-phison SSD 16GB
7GB free (System drive)
Firmware: TST2.04P Max speed: UDMA 66 66 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
5.06% Terrible
Read 27.9
Write 13
Mixed 13.1
4% 18 MB/s
4K Read 7.87
4K Write 0.02
4K Mixed 0.01
12% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 5.06%
Great: 5%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x1GB
1 of 1 slots used
1GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
6.47% Terrible
MC Read 2.1
MC Write 2
MC Mixed 1.5
5% 1.87 GB/s
SC Read 2.1
SC Write 2
SC Mixed 0.1
4% 1.4 GB/s
Latency 187
21% 187 ns
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.47%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback