Asus 900

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive2.76% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
MemoryThe RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (61%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus 900  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK 900
Memory0.3 GB free of 1 GB @ 0.4 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090303
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 21 '16 at 19:38
Run Duration696 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU 61%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron M processor 900MHz
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 0.9 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
48.9% Average
Memory 97.5
1-Core 8.1
2-Core 7
35% 37.5 Pts
4-Core 8.3
8-Core 7.2
1% 7.75 Pts
64-Core 8.2
0% 8.2 Pts
Poor: 10%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Asus-phison OB SSD 4GB
0GB free
Firmware: TST2.04P Max speed: UDMA 66 66 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
0.36% Terrible
Read 1.95
Write 1.76
Mixed 2
0% 1.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.39
4K Write 0.04
4K Mixed 0.04
1% 0.15 MB/s
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.36%
Great: 4%
Asus-phison SSD 8GB
0GB free (System drive)
Firmware: TST2.04P Max speed: UDMA 66 66 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
2.76% Terrible
Read 26.3
Write 9.75
Mixed 13.4
4% 16.5 MB/s
4K Read 2.78
4K Write 0.008
4K Mixed 0.006
4% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.76%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x1GB
1 of 1 slots used
1GB DIMM DDR2
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
10.8% Very poor
MC Read 2.1
MC Write 1.9
MC Mixed 1.6
5% 1.87 GB/s
SC Read 0.7
SC Write 1.7
SC Mixed 0.1
2% 0.83 GB/s
Latency 48.1
83% 48.1 ns
Poor: 4%
This bench: 10.8%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback