Asus Z10PE-D16 WS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics69.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive260% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus Z10PE-D16 WS  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Z10PE-D16 WS
Memory49.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190612
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 15 '21 at 08:16
Run Duration251 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4
SOCKET 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
71.3% Very good
Memory 79
1-Core 94.3
2-Core 190
69% 121 Pts
4-Core 343
8-Core 593
57% 468 Pts
64-Core 1,583
98% 1,583 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P4000
Nvidia(10DE 11A3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1708 MHz, MLim: 1901 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
69.4% Good
Lighting 81.8
Reflection 90.7
Parallax 85.1
67% 85.9 fps
MRender 88.5
Gravity 87.5
Splatting 96.1
75% 90.7 fps
Poor: 64%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 70%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
349GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2170 671 612 611 616 613 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
260% Outstanding
Read 2,254
Write 2,043
Mixed 1,447
SusWrite 882
370% 1,656 MB/s
4K Read 59.4
4K Write 129
4K Mixed 76.9
257% 88.4 MB/s
DQ Read 979
DQ Write 627
DQ Mixed 858
625% 821 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 260%
Great: 340%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
219GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 190 194 193 194 194 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 185
Write 126
Mixed 81.7
SusWrite 192
107% 146 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
178% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 108%
Great: 112%
WD Purple Surveillance 2TB (2017)-$70
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 192 193 192 193 191 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 196
Write 178
Mixed 83.1
SusWrite 192
118% 162 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1
208% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 111%
Great: 104%
WD Purple Surveillance 2TB (2017)-$70
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 181 192 194 192 193 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 190
Write 184
Mixed 81.5
SusWrite 190
118% 162 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
182% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 109%
Great: 104%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$95
1TB free
Firmware: CC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 113 116 118 113 118 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
67.6% Good
Read 120
Write 110
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 116
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.9
142% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 75%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 127 125 128 127 125 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
71.9% Very good
Read 124
Write 128
Mixed 77.2
SusWrite 126
84% 114 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
186% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 36ASF2G72PZ-2G6F1 4x16GB
4 of 16 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
67.6% Good
MC Read 29
MC Write 24.4
MC Mixed 22.6
72% 25.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.6
SC Write 16.2
SC Mixed 16.5
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 82.4
48% 82.4 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 121%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z10PE-D16 WS Builds (Compare 288 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 72%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine

System: Asus Z10PE-D16 WS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $343
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback