PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent. |
Graphics | 28.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 36% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Biostar B365MHC (all builds) |
Memory | 25.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1280 x 720 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20190520 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Mar 10 '21 at 01:39 |
Run Duration | 144 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 10% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
96.1%
Outstanding
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.72
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
28.9%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WDC WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TB
166GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 415000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 264 281 259 269 242 241 MB/s
|
36%
Below average
|
|||
86.4%
Excellent
|
||||
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$58
804GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 96 98 98 98 97 MB/s
|
53.3%
Above average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial CT16G4DFD8213.C16HD1 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
70.9%
Very good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-9400FIntel $85Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 91x |
Core i3-9100FIntel $120Bench 80%, 34,310 samples | 50x |
Core i3-8100Intel $110Bench 71%, 81,392 samples | 14x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 22x |
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 22x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 21x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 115% - Outstanding | Total price: $202 |