Biostar B365MHC

Performance Results


Gaming 35% Sail boat	Desktop 94% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 36% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	30.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	100% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Biostar B365MHC (all builds)
Memory	27.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190520
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 11 '21 at 07:04
Run Duration	137 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	5%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900K-$405 354,223 User benchmarks, average bench 98% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	95.7% Outstanding	Memory 82.3 1-Core 146 2-Core 282 92% 170 Pts	4-Core 584 8-Core 1087 100% 835 Pts	64-Core 1,635 101% 1,635 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 95.7% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% EVGA(3842 6253) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.72 Performing below potential (76^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	30.4% Below average	Lighting 38.7 Reflection 42.9 Parallax 42.7 32% 41.4 fps	MRender 38.1 Gravity 39.1 Splatting 28.4 28% 35.2 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 30.4% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TB 74,123 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 157GB free (System drive) Firmware: 415000WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 369 355 380 361 361 366 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	100% Outstanding	Read 486 Write 424 Mixed 288 SusWrite 365 88% 391 MB/s	4K Read 27.7 4K Write 100 4K Mixed 38.7 144% 55.5 MB/s	DQ Read 321 DQ Write 300 DQ Mixed 194 178% 272 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 117%
Toshiba X300 4TB-$137 23,740 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 3TB free Firmware: FP1R SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 173 173 176 176 174 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 57% Great: 104%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$58 253,816 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 831GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 95 98 98 98 98 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	53.8% Above average	Read 90.2 Write 95.3 Mixed 65.7 SusWrite 97 64% 87.1 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.9 181% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 53.8% Great: 84%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT16G4DFD8213.C16HD1 2x16GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	73% Very good	MC Read 26.8 MC Write 28.1 MC Mixed 22.2 73% 25.7 GB/s	SC Read 17.5 SC Write 29.4 SC Mixed 23.5 67% 23.5 GB/s	Latency 76.3 52% 76.3 ns
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 73% Great: 73%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical B365MHC Builds (Compare 236 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 50%

Yacht

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 42%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Biostar B365MHC

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $95Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	91x
Core i3-9100FIntel $130Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	50x
Core i3-8100Intel $110Bench 71%, 81,392 samples	14x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	22x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	22x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	21x

SSD
240GB 240GBNetacBench 66%, 2,483 samples	14x
WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GBWDCBench 93%, 97,462 samples	9x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	8x

RAM
1x16GBUnknownBench 53%, 15,722 samples	9x
HyperX 2666 C16 1x16GBKingstonBench 47%, 14,529 samples	7x
CT16G4DFD8213.C16HD1 2x16GBCrucialBench 72%, 7 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 114% - Outstanding

Total price: $212

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16