Asus Z170-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics41.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive31.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus Z170-A  (all builds)
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160128
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateMar 07 '21 at 00:09
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$170
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
81.6% Excellent
Memory 84.6
1-Core 111
2-Core 224
79% 140 Pts
4-Core 424
8-Core 633
66% 528 Pts
64-Core 633
39% 633 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Nvidia(10DE 1131) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
41.6% Average
Lighting 57.4
Reflection 78.6
Parallax 50.5
47% 62.2 fps
MRender 68.9
Gravity 64.2
Splatting 0.1
32% 44.4 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial C300-CTFDDAC128M 128GB
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0006
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 108 95 105 97 108 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
31.9% Below average
Read 244
Write 138
Mixed 176
SusWrite 103
37% 165 MB/s
4K Read 30.2
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 7.5
56% 12.7 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 59%
Toshiba A100 240GB
18GB free
Firmware: SBFA10.3
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 474
Write 383
Mixed 353
90% 403 MB/s
4K Read 37.7
4K Write 86.4
4K Mixed 36.7
150% 53.6 MB/s
DQ Read 331
DQ Write 306
DQ Mixed 207
186% 281 MB/s
Poor: 22% Great: 91%
Ct500mx5 0 500GB
48GB free
Firmware: M3CR020
SusWrite @10s intervals: 300 421 435 435 442 441 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 485
Write 427
Mixed 424
SusWrite 412
98% 437 MB/s
4K Read 36.5
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 52
175% 63.1 MB/s
DQ Read 370
DQ Write 327
DQ Mixed 286
231% 328 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 115%
Great: 119%
Crucial M500 120GB-$75
30GB free
Firmware: MU05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 130 128 128 128 111 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
74.2% Very good
Read 416
Write 137
Mixed 201
SusWrite 123
48% 219 MB/s
4K Read 25.5
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 34.1
136% 53.4 MB/s
DQ Read 258
DQ Write 132
DQ Mixed 152
124% 181 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 77%
Samsung Spinpoint T166 500GB-$40
147GB free
Firmware: CR100-12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 41 41 41 41 41 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
31.8% Below average
Read 69.2
Write 76.6
Mixed 45.2
SusWrite 41.4
43% 58.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
131% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 31.8%
Great: 44%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
190GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 119 122 121 123 119 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
70% Very good
Read 124
Write 106
Mixed 25.2
SusWrite 120
68% 93.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
142% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 70%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16ATF1G64AZ-2G1A2 Crucial CT8G4DFD8213.C16FAR2 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
74.5% Very good
MC Read 27.7
MC Write 29.1
MC Mixed 23
76% 26.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 26.8
SC Mixed 22
62% 21.8 GB/s
Latency 72.5
55% 72.5 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170-A Builds (Compare 8,808 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus Z170-A - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $796
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback