Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 118%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 133%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics120% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive134% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory28 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210201
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 05 '21 at 23:16
Run Duration244 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 3700X How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
94.8% Outstanding
Memory 84.2
1-Core 141
2-Core 284
92% 170 Pts
4-Core 564
8-Core 1,130
100% 847 Pts
64-Core 2,127
132% 2,127 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 94.8%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.72
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Lighting 158
Reflection 153
Parallax 155
129% 156 fps
MRender 189
Gravity 137
Splatting 120
118% 149 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 120%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Addlink M.2 PCIE G3x4 NVMe 256GB
163GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM22.6 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 252 257 247 256 247 255 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
134% Outstanding
Read 1,359
Write 1,173
Mixed 586
SusWrite 252
187% 843 MB/s
4K Read 33.4
4K Write 134
4K Mixed 37.3
169% 68.1 MB/s
DQ Read 346
DQ Write 254
DQ Mixed 320
234% 307 MB/s
Poor: 96%
This bench: 134%
Great: 235%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
235GB free
Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2468 1707 1699 1686 1707 1701 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
361% Outstanding
Read 2,567
Write 2,460
Mixed 1,850
SusWrite 1,828
489% 2,176 MB/s
4K Read 66.1
4K Write 168
4K Mixed 94.3
310% 110 MB/s
DQ Read 1,264
DQ Write 970
DQ Mixed 1,123
838% 1,119 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 361%
Great: 410%
WD WD20SPZX-11CRAT0 2TB
936GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 106 107 106 107 106 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
57.5% Above average
Read 94.2
Write 104
Mixed 71.8
SusWrite 106
69% 93.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.5
142% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 76%
WD WD20SPZX-11CRAT0 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 108 112 110 111 112 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
76.7% Very good
Read 157
Write 117
Mixed 59.3
SusWrite 110
81% 111 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 0.7
182% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 76%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$45
273GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 199 200 206 198 206 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
91.5% Outstanding
Read 120
Write 140
Mixed 68.3
SusWrite 199
96% 132 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0
90% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 91.5%
Great: 106%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$97
1.5TB free
Firmware: MX6OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 192 194 191 191 193 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
98.7% Outstanding
Read 153
Write 163
Mixed 47.7
SusWrite 191
100% 139 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
156% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 98.7%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
111% Outstanding
MC Read 43.9
MC Write 39.5
MC Mixed 41
118% 41.5 GB/s
SC Read 25.8
SC Write 24.1
SC Mixed 36.2
82% 28.7 GB/s
Latency 73
55% 73 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 111%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,879 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,018
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback