Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 107%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 126%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics120% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive187% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory28.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210201
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 23 '21 at 21:03
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 3700X How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$370
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
87.6% Excellent
Memory 70.5
1-Core 141
2-Core 281
87% 164 Pts
4-Core 559
8-Core 1129
99% 844 Pts
64-Core 2,144
133% 2,144 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 87.6%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.40
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
120% Outstanding
Lighting 158
Reflection 156
Parallax 154
129% 156 fps
MRender 190
Gravity 137
Splatting 120
118% 149 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 120%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Addlink M.2 PCIE G3x4 NVMe 256GB
172GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM22.6 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 608 250 252 262 251 261 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
187% Outstanding
Read 1331
Write 1,206
Mixed 1,200
SusWrite 314
227% 1,013 MB/s
4K Read 48.2
4K Write 152
4K Mixed 74.9
249% 91.6 MB/s
DQ Read 779
DQ Write 868
DQ Mixed 864
639% 837 MB/s
Poor: 96%
This bench: 187%
Great: 235%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$69
135GB free
Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,681
Write 2,586
Mixed 1939
535% 2402 MB/s
4K Read 68.7
4K Write 176
4K Mixed 97
322% 114 MB/s
DQ Read 1,248
DQ Write 942
DQ Mixed 1,107
824% 1,099 MB/s
Poor: 188% Great: 410%
WD WD20SPZX-11CRAT0 2TB
996GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 82 84 85 84 84 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
61.8% Good
Read 132
Write 114
Mixed 60.3
SusWrite 83.2
71% 97.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
142% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 76%
WD WD20SPZX-11CRAT0 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 109 113 112 112 111 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
66.4% Good
Read 120
Write 99
Mixed 67
SusWrite 110
73% 99.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 0.8
230% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 76%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
273GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 199 203 199 210 205 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
92.4% Outstanding
Read 120
Write 114
Mixed 63.8
SusWrite 202
91% 125 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
89% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 92.4%
Great: 106%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$107
1.5TB free
Firmware: MX6OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 180 181 183 185 178 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 167
Write 172
Mixed 28
SusWrite 181
99% 137 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.5
137% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 100%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
77.7% Very good
MC Read 29.7
MC Write 28
MC Mixed 28.1
82% 28.6 GB/s
SC Read 20.1
SC Write 17.8
SC Mixed 27.1
62% 21.7 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,891 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $983
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback