Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 115%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics119% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive150% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory27.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210201
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 25 '21 at 00:08
Run Duration185 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 3700X How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
94.5% Outstanding
Memory 83.3
1-Core 141
2-Core 282
92% 169 Pts
4-Core 566
8-Core 1,128
100% 847 Pts
64-Core 2,145
133% 2,145 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 94.5%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.40
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
119% Outstanding
Lighting 155
Reflection 154
Parallax 154
126% 154 fps
MRender 186
Gravity 136
Splatting 117
117% 147 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 119%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Addlink M.2 PCIE G3x4 NVMe 256GB
177GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM22.6 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 513 254 261 253 251 261 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
150% Outstanding
Read 1,516
Write 1,181
Mixed 1,154
SusWrite 299
231% 1,038 MB/s
4K Read 41.8
4K Write 143
4K Mixed 40.9
191% 75.2 MB/s
DQ Read 368
DQ Write 258
DQ Mixed 300
228% 308 MB/s
Poor: 96%
This bench: 150%
Great: 235%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
135GB free
Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,674
Write 2,593
Mixed 1,947
536% 2,405 MB/s
4K Read 69.4
4K Write 180
4K Mixed 97.3
325% 115 MB/s
DQ Read 1,275
DQ Write 964
DQ Mixed 1,105
830% 1,115 MB/s
Poor: 188% Great: 410%
WD WD20SPZX-11CRAT0 2TB
996GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 99 100 99 101 101 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
65.5% Good
Read 128
Write 98.7
Mixed 74.8
SusWrite 99.6
74% 100 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.8
195% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 76%
WD WD20SPZX-11CRAT0 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 109 112 111 112 110 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
67.7% Good
Read 126
Write 112
Mixed 68.5
SusWrite 109
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.3
167% 2 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 76%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$45
273GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 207 196 201 199 195 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
92% Outstanding
Read 122
Write 120
Mixed 79.5
SusWrite 199
95% 130 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
101% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 92%
Great: 106%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$97
1.5TB free
Firmware: MX6OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 190 188 193 194 186 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 164
Write 155
Mixed 39.5
SusWrite 190
99% 137 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
153% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 101%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
106% Outstanding
MC Read 43.6
MC Write 36.2
MC Mixed 38.2
112% 39.3 GB/s
SC Read 24.6
SC Write 24.1
SC Mixed 36.1
81% 28.3 GB/s
Latency 74.7
54% 74.7 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 106%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,879 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,018
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback