Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 117%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 133%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics121% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive190% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory27.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210201
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 28 '21 at 21:18
Run Duration243 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 3700X How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$370
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
93.7% Outstanding
Memory 82.3
1-Core 141
2-Core 282
91% 168 Pts
4-Core 563
8-Core 1,129
100% 846 Pts
64-Core 2143
133% 2143 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 93.7%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.72
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
121% Outstanding
Lighting 160
Reflection 156
Parallax 155
130% 157 fps
MRender 190
Gravity 136
Splatting 120
118% 149 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 121%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Addlink M.2 PCIE G3x4 NVMe 256GB
141GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM22.6 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 662 263 254 252 261 253 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
190% Outstanding
Read 1,378
Write 1,192
Mixed 1,199
SusWrite 324
229% 1,023 MB/s
4K Read 47.8
4K Write 155
4K Mixed 76
252% 92.8 MB/s
DQ Read 791
DQ Write 867
DQ Mixed 860
638% 839 MB/s
Poor: 96%
This bench: 190%
Great: 235%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$69
235GB free
Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2500 1715 1717 1712 1716 1714 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
371% Outstanding
Read 2,676
Write 2,578
Mixed 1,980
SusWrite 1,846
510% 2,270 MB/s
4K Read 69.2
4K Write 179
4K Mixed 97.1
324% 115 MB/s
DQ Read 1,284
DQ Write 971
DQ Mixed 1,139
849% 1,131 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 371%
Great: 410%
WD WD20SPZX-11CRAT0 2TB
942GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 82 84 85 84 83 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
63.5% Good
Read 138
Write 76
Mixed 72.5
SusWrite 82.5
68% 92.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 0.8
208% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 76%
WD WD20SPZX-11CRAT0 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 111 110 110 113 113 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
72.7% Very good
Read 142
Write 71.7
Mixed 64
SusWrite 111
71% 97 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.4
172% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 76%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
273GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 131 136 134 136 136 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
75.6% Very good
Read 132
Write 102
Mixed 75.2
SusWrite 132
81% 110 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
68% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 106%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$107
1.5TB free
Firmware: MX6OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 191 195 195 193 195 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
97.2% Outstanding
Read 146
Write 162
Mixed 28.3
SusWrite 193
95% 132 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
157% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 97.2%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
111% Outstanding
MC Read 44
MC Write 39.8
MC Mixed 40.5
118% 41.4 GB/s
SC Read 24.5
SC Write 24.1
SC Mixed 35.2
80% 27.9 GB/s
Latency 76.5
52% 76.5 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 111%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,891 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $983
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback