Asus P8P67 REV 3.1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 33% Sail boat	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 25% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	50.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus P8P67 REV 3.1 (all builds)
Memory	13.8 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110629
Uptime	2.7 Days
Run Date	Mar 02 '21 at 01:05
Run Duration	177 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	20%

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246 143,007 User benchmarks, average bench 66% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	66% Good	Memory 72.7 1-Core 80.5 2-Core 179 63% 111 Pts	4-Core 342 8-Core 348 46% 345 Pts	64-Core 338 21% 338 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 66% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% MSI(1462 3160) CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing below potential (76^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	50.7% Above average	Lighting 62.9 Reflection 70.9 Parallax 63.5 51% 65.8 fps	MRender 68.4 Gravity 59.4 Splatting 56 50% 61.3 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 50.7% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 14GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 459 Write 454 Mixed 352 94% 422 MB/s	4K Read 34.5 4K Write 82.6 4K Mixed 41.1 149% 52.7 MB/s	DQ Read 372 DQ Write 353 DQ Mixed 367 274% 364 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$32 55,121 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 136GB free Firmware: 15.01H15 SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 99 99 100 101 102 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	61.5% Good	Read 114 Write 99.4 Mixed 75.7 SusWrite 100 72% 97.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.9 166% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 61.5% Great: 74%
WD Elements 2TB 35,768 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 33GB free, PID 10b8 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 73 67 75 72 73 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	29.2% Poor	Read 66.1 Write 65.8 Mixed 40.4 SusWrite 71.2 82% 60.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.4 59% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 29.2% Great: 44%
Toshiba StorE HDD 640GB 40 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 19GB free, PID 0b15 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 20 19 19 19 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	10.1% Very poor	Read 31.4 Write 24 Mixed 18.6 SusWrite 19.3 30% 23.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.4 29% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 10.1% Great: 18%
WD 2500BEV External 250GB 326 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 3GB free, PID 0702 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 19 19 19 20 19 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	14.9% Very poor	Read 30.7 Write 23.4 Mixed 21.9 SusWrite 19.2 31% 23.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.7 94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 14.9% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMX8GX3M2A1600C9 CML16GX3M2A1600C9 CMX8GX3M2A1600C9 CML16GX3M2A1600C9 24GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	44.6% Average	MC Read 15.8 MC Write 14.9 MC Mixed 15 44% 15.2 GB/s	SC Read 13.1 SC Write 15.9 SC Mixed 15.8 43% 14.9 GB/s	Latency 95.3 42% 95.3 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 44.6% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8P67 REV 3.1 Builds (Compare 554 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 36%

Jet ski

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 REV 3.1

CPU
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	160x
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples	126x
Core i7-2600Intel $186Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	75x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	48x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	44x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	38x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	19x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	18x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	18x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	23x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	15x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	10x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $546

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16