Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results


Gaming 86% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 88% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	92.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	161% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 (all builds)
Memory	28.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170602
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 14 '17 at 22:47
Run Duration	216 Seconds
Run User	NZL-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195 144,475 User benchmarks, average bench 69% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	87.8% Excellent	Memory 83.4 1-Core 124 2-Core 246 84% 151 Pts	4-Core 493 8-Core 983 87% 738 Pts	64-Core 1,360 84% 1,360 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 87.8% Great: 81%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Asus(1043 8597) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2192 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 382.33 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	92.1% Outstanding	Lighting 115 Reflection 125 Parallax 118 94% 119 fps	MRender 108 Gravity 106 Splatting 111 89% 108 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 92.1% Great: 88%
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Gigabyte(1458 3667) 2GB CLim: 1457 MHz, MLim: 1475 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 382.33 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	19.9% Very poor	Lighting 24.6 Reflection 19.6 Parallax 22.9 20% 22.4 fps	MRender 28.1 Gravity 26.2 Splatting 19.3 20% 24.5 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 19.9% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 250GB-$251 41,998 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 182GB free Firmware: DXT09B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 11863 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 2890 (B1) Unknown 92 92 86 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 80 58 20 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 3 (EB) Unknown 99 99 625 (F1) Unknown 99 99 24066960616	77.4% Very good	Read 511 Write 248 Mixed 227 72% 329 MB/s	4K Read 28.9 4K Write 83 4K Mixed 13.8 105% 41.9 MB/s	DQ Read 318 DQ Write 207 DQ Mixed 31.9 86% 186 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 77.4% Great: 85%
Corsair Force MP500 NVMe PCIe M.2 240GB-$43 14,860 User benchmarks, average bench 151% 147GB free (System drive) Firmware: E7FM02.1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	161% Outstanding	Read 2,279 Write 222 Mixed 356 202% 952 MB/s	4K Read 32.1 4K Write 98.6 4K Mixed 34.7 145% 55.1 MB/s	DQ Read 349 DQ Write 224 DQ Mixed 69.8 110% 214 MB/s
Poor: 106% ↑ This bench: 161% Great: 210%
OCZ Vertex 3 MAX IOPS 240GB-$160 1,284 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 18GB free Firmware: 2.25 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 102 102 5387820 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 83 83 -63093069563080 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2782 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 584 (B1) Unknown 0 0 3 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 30 30 128850984990 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 5387820 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 5387820 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 5387820 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 2258 (EA) Unknown 0 0 2342 (F1) Unknown 0 0 2342 (F2) Unknown 0 0 3283	81.5% Excellent	Read 487 Write 272 Mixed 333 80% 364 MB/s	4K Read 29.7 4K Write 83.6 4K Mixed 21.8 117% 45 MB/s	DQ Read 267 DQ Write 225 DQ Mixed 68.7 100% 187 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 81.5% Great: 91%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$79 462,780 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 1.5TB free Firmware: CC26 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 111 99 32095464 (03) Spinup time 98 96 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 819 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 952526 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1192 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 297 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 83 65 319488017 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 82 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 3367 (C2) HDA temperature 17 40 25769803793 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -109259673042406 (F1) Unknown 100 253 1614997774 (F2) Unknown 100 253 4864499906	86.9% Excellent	Read 167 Write 136 Mixed 138 111% 147 MB/s	4K Read 0.41 4K Write 1.46 4K Mixed 0.16 62% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 86.9% Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 215GB free Firmware: CC82 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 114 99 64929800 (03) Spinup time 95 94 0 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6175 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 76 60 43389322 (09) Power-on hours count 83 83 15083 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2307 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 98 4295753755 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 74 54 4732289050 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 381 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 51 51 98651 (C2) HDA temperature 26 46 -140737488355302 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -9470402882733 (F1) Unknown 100 253 74380061658527 (F2) Unknown 100 253 34345506631988	77.2% Very good	Read 160 Write 109 Mixed 134 101% 135 MB/s	4K Read 0.87 4K Write 1.01 4K Mixed 0.15 71% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 77.2% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3333 C16 2x16GB 109 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	MC Read 40.7 MC Write 39.1 MC Mixed 36.7 111% 38.8 GB/s	SC Read 25.4 SC Write 41.4 SC Mixed 30.9 93% 32.6 GB/s	Latency 74.5 54% 74.5 ns
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 111%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming K7 Builds (Compare 525 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 79%

Battleship

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 77%

Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

CPU
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	96x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $211Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	69x
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	59x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	67x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	57x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	29x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	22x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	21x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	17x

RAM
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	20x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	18x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $37Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 98% - Outstanding

Total price: $651

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)