Asus Z590 WIFI GUNDAM EDITION

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 134%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 125%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 105%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics125% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive267% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus Z590 WIFI GUNDAM EDITION  (all builds)
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210427
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 18 '22 at 21:51
Run Duration214 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU 16%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11600KF-$157
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
105% Outstanding
Memory 96.2
1-Core 173
2-Core 336
110% 202 Pts
4-Core 611
8-Core 1,025
100% 818 Pts
64-Core 1,216
75% 1,216 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 105%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
Nvidia(10DE 153C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 511.79
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
125% Outstanding
Lighting 174
Reflection 166
Parallax 158
141% 166 fps
MRender 178
Gravity 132
Splatting 115
113% 142 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 125%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$72
378GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1937 1963 694 215 242 274 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
267% Outstanding
Read 1,206
Write 1,730
Mixed 1,368
SusWrite 888
294% 1298 MB/s
4K Read 65.7
4K Write 210
4K Mixed 96.2
334% 124 MB/s
DQ Read 1575
DQ Write 1,187
DQ Mixed 1,235
963% 1,332 MB/s
Poor: 144%
This bench: 267%
Great: 295%
Samsung SM841 2.5" 7mm 128GB
119GB free
Firmware: DXM01D0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 236 236 236 236 236 236 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
26.2% Poor
Read 210
Write 227
Mixed 191
SusWrite 236
49% 216 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 3.3
11% 3.37 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 26.2%
Great: 99%
Corsair Force MP500 NVMe PCIe M.2 240GB-$49
153GB free
Firmware: E7FM04.C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 725 928 1002 1173 1173 1039 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
210% Outstanding
Read 1,065
Write 754
Mixed 581
SusWrite 1,006
191% 852 MB/s
4K Read 37.9
4K Write 177
4K Mixed 55.6
222% 90.2 MB/s
DQ Read 926
DQ Write 779
DQ Mixed 589
513% 765 MB/s
Poor: 106%
This bench: 210%
Great: 210%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-3600C14-8GTRSB 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
127% Outstanding
MC Read 49.4
MC Write 46.7
MC Mixed 41.7
131% 45.9 GB/s
SC Read 29.5
SC Write 48.7
SC Mixed 36.1
109% 38.1 GB/s
Latency 53.2
75% 53.2 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 127%
Great: 154%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z590 WIFI GUNDAM EDITION Builds (Compare 1,207 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 187%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 187%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus Z590 WIFI GUNDAM EDITION

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $850
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-13600K $232Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $378WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback