Asus P7H55-M PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 51% Yacht	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.45% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	24.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P7H55-M PRO (all builds)
Memory	5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110104
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 10 '21 at 18:37
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	GRC-User
Background CPU	26%

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3 560 944 User benchmarks, average bench 50% LGA1156, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.35 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	50.9% Above average	Memory 66.7 1-Core 80.5 2-Core 146 57% 97.8 Pts	4-Core 204 8-Core 202 27% 203 Pts	64-Core 203 13% 203 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 50.9% Great: 55%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630 60,212 User benchmarks, average bench 4% HP(103C 0936) 2GB CLim: 875 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 461.09 Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	3.45% Terrible	Lighting 3.9 Reflection 5.4 Parallax 4.6 3% 4.63 fps	MRender 5 Gravity 4.9 Splatting 4.7 4% 4.87 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.45% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
TOSHIBA-TR200 240GB 36,832 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 82GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFA15.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 135 86 106 74 72 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	24.7% Poor	Read 129 Write 94.2 Mixed 82.3 SusWrite 112 23% 104 MB/s	4K Read 11.9 4K Write 16.9 4K Mixed 10 40% 12.9 MB/s	DQ Read 11.3 DQ Write 15.8 DQ Mixed 13.3 10% 13.5 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 24.7% Great: 90%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 812GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 60 60 58 58 58 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	64.9% Good	Read 167 Write 133 Mixed 71 SusWrite 59 79% 107 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1.1 222% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 64.9% Great: 109%
Seagate ST380815AS 80GB-$47 16,844 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 54GB free Firmware: 4.AAA SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 60 60 58 58 57 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	35.3% Below average	Read 64 Write 65.7 Mixed 42.5 SusWrite 58.8 42% 57.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 123% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 35.3% Great: 42%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8GB 82,857 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	22.1% Poor	MC Read 6.8 MC Write 7.9 MC Mixed 7.6 21% 7.43 GB/s	SC Read 5 SC Write 4.3 SC Mixed 6.9 15% 5.4 GB/s	Latency 109 37% 109 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 22.1% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P7H55-M PRO Builds (Compare 417 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 24%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P7H55-M PRO

CPU
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	76x
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples	69x
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples	58x

GPU
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	28x
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples	24x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	18x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	30x
A400 120GBKingston $30Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	15x
SSD Pro 1500 Series 180GBIntel $209Bench 69%, 7,834 samples	7x

RAM
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	163x
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	113x
12GBUnknownBench 35%, 85,415 samples	41x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 53% - Above average

Total price: $326

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16