Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 41% Speed boat	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	3.19% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3 560 944 User benchmarks, average bench 50% LGA1156, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.35 GHz Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	38.3% Below average	Memory 61.6 1-Core 82.4 2-Core 105 51% 82.9 Pts	4-Core 86.5 8-Core 102 12% 94.1 Pts	64-Core 101 6% 101 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 38.3% Great: 55%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 430 22,369 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Asus(1043 83B8) 1GB CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	3.19% Terrible	Lighting 4.37 Reflection 5.15 Parallax 3.5 4% 4.34 fps	MRender 5.9 Gravity 4.3 Splatting 0.13 2% 3.45 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.19% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139 139,542 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 567GB free (System drive) Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 25 20 27 44 31 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	28.1% Poor	Read 67.8 Write 62.5 Mixed 43.8 SusWrite 30 38% 51 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0 32% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 28.1% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8GB 82,857 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	23% Poor	MC Read 8.7 MC Write 6.2 MC Mixed 8.3 22% 7.73 GB/s	SC Read 6.5 SC Write 5.8 SC Mixed 7.2 19% 6.5 GB/s	Latency 123 32% 123 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 23% Great: 51%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples	17x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	7x
GeForce GT 630NvidiaBench 4%, 60,212 samples	4x

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $391

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16