Asus GL702VMK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics49.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive57.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus GL702VMK  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK GL702VMK
Memory9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190419
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateFeb 07 '21 at 21:23
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User LTU-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
76.7% Very good
Memory 86
1-Core 112
2-Core 196
76% 131 Pts
4-Core 365
8-Core 524
56% 444 Pts
64-Core 513
32% 513 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile)
Asus(1043 1760) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
49.6% Average
Lighting 60
Reflection 68.4
Parallax 60.4
49% 62.9 fps
MRender 65.3
Gravity 60.2
Splatting 61.3
51% 62.3 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS128G39TND-N210A 128GB
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 30200P10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 124 131 124 117 117 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
57.2% Above average
Read 366
Write 132
Mixed 144
SusWrite 124
42% 191 MB/s
4K Read 30.5
4K Write 35.1
4K Mixed 17.3
87% 27.6 MB/s
DQ Read 333
DQ Write 89.2
DQ Mixed 109
107% 177 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 70%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
767GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3V0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 121 127 125 126 125 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
72.7% Very good
Read 129
Write 120
Mixed 30
SusWrite 125
73% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
129% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43BB1-CRC 859B BLS8G4S240FSDK.8FBD 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
76.6% Very good
MC Read 29.3
MC Write 30
MC Mixed 22.2
78% 27.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 29.7
SC Mixed 23.4
67% 23.4 GB/s
Latency 71.3
56% 71.3 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GL702VMK Builds (Compare 420 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

System: Asus GL702VMK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback