Asus GL702VMK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics49.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus GL702VMK  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK GL702VMK
Memory9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190419
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateFeb 07 '21 at 21:11
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User LTU-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
73.1% Very good
Memory 83.2
1-Core 110
2-Core 189
74% 127 Pts
4-Core 340
8-Core 527
54% 434 Pts
64-Core 519
32% 519 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile)
Asus(1043 1760) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
49.5% Average
Lighting 59.9
Reflection 68.5
Parallax 60.2
49% 62.9 fps
MRender 64.7
Gravity 60
Splatting 62
51% 62.2 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS128G39TND-N210A 128GB
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 30200P10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 118 128 121 113 77 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
51.1% Above average
Read 372
Write 112
Mixed 135
SusWrite 112
40% 183 MB/s
4K Read 29.1
4K Write 26.5
4K Mixed 17.1
80% 24.2 MB/s
DQ Read 172
DQ Write 75.5
DQ Mixed 87
74% 112 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 70%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
767GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3V0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 125 127 123 121 121 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
70.4% Very good
Read 122
Write 117
Mixed 34.2
SusWrite 123
72% 99.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
112% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43BB1-CRC 859B BLS8G4S240FSDK.8FBD 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
75.7% Very good
MC Read 28.8
MC Write 29.8
MC Mixed 22
77% 26.9 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 30.3
SC Mixed 22.5
67% 23.3 GB/s
Latency 74.9
53% 74.9 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GL702VMK Builds (Compare 420 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

System: Asus GL702VMK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback