Asus GL702VMK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics27.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus GL702VMK  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK GL702VMK
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190419
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateFeb 07 '21 at 21:09
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User LTU-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
72.3% Very good
Memory 72.4
1-Core 111
2-Core 216
74% 133 Pts
4-Core 389
8-Core 565
60% 477 Pts
64-Core 562
35% 562 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile)
Asus(1043 1760) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
27.3% Poor
Lighting 30
Reflection 29.8
Parallax 15.9
24% 25.2 fps
MRender 8.4
Gravity 48.1
Splatting 55.7
33% 37.4 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 27.3%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS128G39TND-N210A 128GB
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 30200P10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 114 92 91 88 81 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
48.3% Average
Read 361
Write 128
Mixed 138
SusWrite 95.5
40% 181 MB/s
4K Read 20
4K Write 35.6
4K Mixed 12.5
65% 22.7 MB/s
DQ Read 323
DQ Write 77.6
DQ Mixed 124
111% 175 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 70%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
767GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3V0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 118 114 116 106 99 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
71.3% Very good
Read 137
Write 124
Mixed 24.6
SusWrite 112
72% 99.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
129% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43BB1-CRC 859B BLS8G4S240FSDK.8FBD 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
75.7% Very good
MC Read 28.6
MC Write 30.7
MC Mixed 22.4
78% 27.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 31.8
SC Mixed 22.6
67% 23.5 GB/s
Latency 96
42% 96 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GL702VMK Builds (Compare 420 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

System: Asus GL702VMK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $336
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback