HP Pro 3500 Series

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics29.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive41.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP Pro 3500 Series  (all builds)
MotherboardFoxconn 2ABF
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150112
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJan 25 '21 at 16:18
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
77.1% Very good
Memory 84.4
1-Core 106
2-Core 208
76% 133 Pts
4-Core 382
8-Core 518
57% 450 Pts
64-Core 514
32% 514 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.09
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.9% Poor
Lighting 37.8
Reflection 41.6
Parallax 42.8
31% 40.7 fps
MRender 38.1
Gravity 40
Splatting 28
28% 35.4 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 29.9%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 320 Series 160GB-$149
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4PC1LE04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 134 131 117 117 86 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
41.6% Average
Read 252
Write 158
Mixed 160
SusWrite 120
38% 172 MB/s
4K Read 16.4
4K Write 27.2
4K Mixed 18.7
63% 20.8 MB/s
DQ Read 133
DQ Write 69.6
DQ Mixed 67.4
59% 90 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 51%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
48GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 114 114 115 116 116 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
66.9% Good
Read 118
Write 107
Mixed 66
SusWrite 115
74% 102 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
192% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 109%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
316GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 83 82 83 82 85 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
41% Average
Read 60.5
Write 54.5
Mixed 49.5
SusWrite 82.4
46% 61.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
100% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 41%
Great: 59%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72
443GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 63 64 63 64 63 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
31.8% Below average
Read 48
Write 50.7
Mixed 21.2
SusWrite 62.7
33% 45.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.3
73% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 31.8%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6EFR8C-PB Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
51.1% Above average
MC Read 19.2
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 15.7
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 17
SC Mixed 16.6
46% 16.3 GB/s
Latency 72.8
55% 72.8 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pro 3500 Series Builds (Compare 1,035 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pro 3500 Series

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback