HP Pro 3500 Series

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics29.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP Pro 3500 Series  (all builds)
MotherboardFoxconn 2ABF
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150112
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 30 '20 at 05:33
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 16%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
77.5% Very good
Memory 83.8
1-Core 105
2-Core 209
75% 133 Pts
4-Core 393
8-Core 507
57% 450 Pts
64-Core 509
32% 509 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (40 fps cap detected)
29.3% Poor
Lighting 39.5
Reflection 33.6
Parallax 40.9
32% 38 fps
MRender 0
Gravity 41.1
Splatting 39.6
24% 26.9 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 320 Series 160GB-$149
2GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4PC1LE00
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 248
Write 166
Mixed 160
42% 192 MB/s
4K Read 15.8
4K Write 24.5
4K Mixed 17.8
60% 19.4 MB/s
DQ Read 124
DQ Write 61.5
DQ Mixed 54.9
51% 80 MB/s
Poor: 30% Great: 51%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
66GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 114 115 115 116 116 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
70.5% Very good
Read 130
Write 116
Mixed 74
SusWrite 115
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
195% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 109%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
283GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 79 78 80 79 80 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
49.1% Average
Read 92
Write 62.3
Mixed 63.7
SusWrite 78.7
55% 74.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
136% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 59%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72
583GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 86 90 89 92 86 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
37.2% Below average
Read 40.5
Write 59
Mixed 41.7
SusWrite 88.9
42% 57.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.2
65% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 57%
TOSHIBA MK4058GSX 400GB
97GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 27 27 28 28 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
14.8% Very poor
Read 30.7
Write 19.8
Mixed 20
SusWrite 27.2
32% 24.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
66% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.8%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6EFR8C-PB Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
51% Above average
MC Read 19
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 15.9
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 17
SC Mixed 16.5
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 73.8
54% 73.8 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 51%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pro 3500 Series Builds (Compare 1,035 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pro 3500 Series

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback